Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28529600›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2017

Prospective evaluation of fluorescence

Tianhai Lin, Zhenhua Liu, Liangren Liu, Lu Yang, Ping Han, Peng Zhang, Qiang Wei

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tianhai LinDepartment of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, P.R. China.
Zhenhua LiuDepartment of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, P.R. China.
Liangren LiuDepartment of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, P.R. China.
Lu YangDepartment of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, P.R. China.
Ping HanDepartment of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, P.R. China.
Peng ZhangDepartment of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, P.R. China.
Qiang WeiDepartment of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, P.R. China.
Sichuan University · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CNThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is the most common type of cancer of the bladder and upper urinary tract, and is characterized by a high risk of recurrence and progression. Urine fluorescence

Indexed as

bladder cancercytologydiagnosisfluorescence in situ hybridizationsensitivityspecificitytransitional cell carcinomaurothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID28529600
PMCPMC5431676
OpenAlexW2598156177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.