Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28529488›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in physiology2017

Endothelial Extracellular Vesicles-Promises and Challenges.

Carina Hromada, Severin Mühleder, Johannes Grillari, Heinz Redl, Wolfgang Holnthoner

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Microfluidic Approaches for Affinity-Based Exosome Separation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carina HromadaAUVA Research Centre, Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical TraumatologyVienna, Austria.
Severin MühlederAUVA Research Centre, Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical TraumatologyVienna, Austria.
Johannes GrillariAustrian Cluster for Tissue RegenerationVienna, Austria.
Heinz RedlAUVA Research Centre, Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical TraumatologyVienna, Austria.
Wolfgang HolnthonerAUVA Research Centre, Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical TraumatologyVienna, Austria.
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology · ATAustrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration · ATBOKU University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles, including exosomes, microparticles, and apoptotic bodies, are phospholipid bilayer-enclosed vesicles that have once been considered as cell debris lacking biological functions. However, they have recently gained immense interest in the scientific community due to their role in intercellular communication, immunity, tissue regeneration as well as in the onset, and progression of various pathologic conditions. Extracellular vesicles of endothelial origin have been found to play a versatile role in the human body, since they are on the one hand known to contribute to cardiovascular diseases, but on the other hand have also been reported to promote endothelial cell survival. Hence, endothelial extracellular vesicles hold promising therapeutic potential to be used as a new tool to detect as well as treat a great number of diseases. This calls for clinically approved, standardized, and efficient isolation and characterization protocols to harvest and purify endothelial extracellular vesicles. However, such methods and techniques to fulfill stringent requirements for clinical trials have yet to be developed or are not harmonized internationally. In this review, recent advances and challenges in the field of endothelial extracellular vesicle research are discussed and current problems and limitations regarding isolation and characterization are pointed out.

Indexed as

endothelial cellsexosomesextracellular vesiclesmicroparticlespathology

Identifiers

PMID28529488
PMCPMC5418228
OpenAlexW2610300098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.