ReviewChromatographia2017
Different Stationary Phase Selectivities and Morphologies for Intact Protein Separations.
Review in Chromatographia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biopharmaceutical Analysis by HPLC: Practices and Challenges.Chonnam medical journal · 2025Article
- Online Mixed-Bed Ion Exchange Chromatography for Native Top-Down Proteomics of Complex Mixtures.Journal of proteome research · 2024Article
- Studying protein structure and function by native separation-mass spectrometry.Nature reviews. Chemistry · 2022Review
- Stability-Indicating Analytical Approach for Stability Evaluation of Lactoferrin.Pharmaceutics · 2021Article
- Novel Strategies to Address the Challenges in Top-Down Proteomics.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2021Review
- Influence of Blood Collection Methods and Long-Term Plasma Storage on Quorum-Sensing Peptide Stability.ACS omega · 2020Article
- Simple Tip-Based Sample Processing Method for Urinary Proteomic Analysis.Analytical chemistry · 2019Article
- Proteoform-Resolved FcɤRIIIa Binding Assay for Fab Glycosylated Monoclonal Antibodies Achieved by Affinity Chromatography Mass Spectrometry of Fc Moieties.Frontiers in chemistry · 2019Article
- Mobile Affinity Sorbent Chromatography.Analytical chemistry · 2018Article
- Continuous Elution Proteoform Identification of Myelin Basic Protein by Superficially Porous Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography and Fourier Transform Mass Spectrometry.Analytical chemistry · 2017Article
- Mass spectrometry-based methods to characterize highly heterogeneous biopharmaceuticals, vaccines, and nonbiological complex drugs at the intact-mass level.Mass spectrometry reviewsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The central dogma of biology proposed that one gene encodes for one protein. We now know that this does not reflect reality. The human body has approximately 20,000 protein-encoding genes; each of these genes can encode more than one protein. Proteins expressed from a single gene can vary in terms of their post-translational modifications, which often regulate their function within the body. Understanding the proteins within our bodies is a key step in understanding the cause, and perhaps the solution, to disease. This is one of the application areas of proteomics, which is defined as the study of all proteins expressed within an organism at a given point in time. The human proteome is incredibly complex. The complexity of biological samples requires a combination of technologies to achieve high resolution and high sensitivity analysis. Despite the significant advances in mass spectrometry, separation techniques are still essential in this field. Liquid chromatography is an indispensable tool by which low-abundant proteins in complex samples can be enriched and separated. However, advances in chromatography are not as readily adapted in proteomics compared to advances in mass spectrometry. Biologists in this field still favour reversed-phase chromatography with fully porous particles. The purpose of this review is to highlight alternative selectivities and stationary phase morphologies that show potential for application in top-down proteomics; the study of intact proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.