ReviewNeuroscience letters2018
What's in a context? Cautions, limitations, and potential paths forward.
Review in Neuroscience letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effects of episodic context on memory integration.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Differential effects of bilateral hippocampal CA3 damage on the implicit learning and recognition of complex event sequences.Cognitive neuroscience · 2024Article
- Sex differences in the context dependency of episodic memory.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2024Article
- Review
- Memory consolidation during sleep involves context reinstatement in humans.Cell reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Context matters: changes in memory over a period of sleep are driven by encoding context.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Encoding contexts are incidentally reinstated during competitive retrieval and track the temporal dynamics of memory interference.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2022Article
- Genes associated with cognitive performance in the Morris water maze: an RNA-seq study.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Constructing autobiographical events within a spatial or temporal context: a comparison of two targeted episodic induction techniques.Memory (Hove, England) · 2019Article
- Neural measures associated with configural threat acquisition.Neurobiology of learning and memory · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of memory is to guide current and future behavior based on previous experiences. Part of this process involves either discriminating between or generalizing across similar experiences that contain overlapping conditions (such as space, time, or internal state), which we often conceptualize as "contexts". In this review, we highlight major challenges facing the field as we attempt a neuroscience-based approach to the study of context and its impact on learning and memory. Here, we review some of the methodologies and approaches used to investigate context in both animals and humans, including the neurobiological mechanisms involved. Finally, we propose three tenets for operationalizing context in the experimental setting: 1) contexts must be stable over time along an experiential dimension; 2) contexts must be at least moderately complex in nature and their representations must be modifiable or adaptable, and 3) contexts must have some behavioral relevance (be it overt or incidental) so that its role can be measured.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.