Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28528909›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2017

Melanopsin Contributions to the Representation of Images in the Early Visual System.

Annette E Allen, Riccardo Storchi, Franck P Martial, Robert A Bedford, Robert J Lucas

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Melanopsin enhances image persistence.Current biology : CB · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Colour and melanopsin mediated responses in the murine retina.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Melanopsin phototransduction: beyond canonical cascades.The Journal of experimental biology · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Annette E AllenDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK. Electronic address: annette.allen@manchester.ac.uk.
Riccardo StorchiDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Franck P MartialDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Robert A BedfordDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Robert J LucasDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK. Electronic address: robert.lucas@manchester.ac.uk.
University of Manchester · GB

Funding

European Research Council 268970
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Melanopsin photoreception enhances retinal responses to variations in ambient light (irradiance) and drives non-image-forming visual reflexes such as circadian entrainment [1-6]. Melanopsin signals also reach brain regions responsible for form vision [7-9], but melanopsin's contribution, if any, to encoding visual images remains unclear. We addressed this deficit using principles of receptor silent substitution to present images in which visibility for melanopsin versus rods+cones was independently modulated, and we recorded evoked responses in the mouse dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN; thalamic relay for cortical vision). Approximately 20% of dLGN units responded to patterns visible only to melanopsin, revealing that melanopsin signals alone can convey spatial information. Spatial receptive fields (RFs) mapped using melanopsin-isolating stimuli had ON centers with diameters ∼13°. Melanopsin and rod+cone responses differed in the temporal domain, and responses to slow changes in radiance (<0.9 Hz) and stationary images were deficient when stimuli were rendered invisible for melanopsin. We employed these data to devise and test a mathematical model of melanopsin's involvement in form vision and applied it, along with further experimental recordings, to explore melanopsin signals under simulated active view of natural scenes. Our findings reveal that melanopsin enhances the thalamic representation of scenes containing local correlations in radiance, compensating for the high temporal frequency bias of cone vision and the negative correlation between magnitude and frequency for changes in direction of view. Together, these data reveal a distinct melanopsin contribution to encoding visual images, predicting that, under natural view, melanopsin augments the early visual system's ability to encode patterns over moderate spatial scales.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsBrain MappingGeniculate BodiesMaleMelanopsinMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutModels, AnimalPhotic StimulationRetinaRetinal Cone Photoreceptor CellsRetinal Rod Photoreceptor CellsRod OpsinsSoftwareMelanopsinmiddle-wavelength opsinRod Opsinsdorsal lateral geniculate nucleusintrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cellsmelanopsinmetameric light stimulimouse visionreceptive fieldsreceptor silent substitutionspatial vision

Identifiers

PMID28528909
PMCPMC5462620
OpenAlexW2615845725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.