Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28528899›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2017

Effect of professional society recommendations on women's desire for a routine pelvic examination.

George F Sawaya, Karen K Smith-McCune, Steven E Gregorich, Michelle Moghadassi, Miriam Kuppermann

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

George F SawayaDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Center for Healthcare Value, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. Electronic address: george.sawaya@ucsf.edu.
Karen K Smith-McCuneDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Steven E GregorichDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Michelle MoghadassiDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Miriam KuppermannDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Using comparative effectiveness analyses to optimize cervical cancer screeningR01CA169093 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SAWAYA, GEORGE F · 2013 to 2016
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA169093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe American College of Physicians strongly recommends against performing pelvic examinations in asymptomatic, nonpregnant women, citing evidence of harm (false-positive testing, unnecessary surgery) and no evidence of benefit. In contrast, the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends pelvic examinations in asymptomatic women beginning at age 21 years, citing expert opinion.

objectiveWe sought to evaluate if providing women with professional societies' conflicting statements about pelvic examinations (recommendations and rationales) would influence their desire for a routine examination. STUDY

designWe recruited 452 women ages 21-65 years from 2 women's clinics to participate in a 50-minute face-to-face interview about cervical cancer screening that included a 2-phase study related to pelvic examinations. In the first phase, 262 women were asked about their desire for the examination without being provided information about professional societies' recommendations. In the second phase, 190 women were randomized to review summaries of the American College of Physicians or American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists statement followed by an interview.

resultsFirst-phase participants served as the referent: 79% (208/262) indicated they would want a routine examination if given a choice. In the second phase, a similar percentage of women randomized to the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists summary had this desire (82%: 80/97; adjusted odds ratio, 1.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.69-2.70). Women randomized to the American College of Physicians summary, however, were less likely to indicate they would opt for an examination (39%: 36/93; adjusted odds ratio, 0.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.21). Overall, 94% (179/190) believed the potential benefits and harms should be discussed prior to the examination.

conclusionProviding women with a professional society's recommendation advising against routine pelvic examinations substantially reduced their desire to have one. Educational materials are needed to ensure women's informed preferences and values are reflected in decisions about pelvic examinations.

Indexed as

Patient PreferenceSocieties, MedicalAdultAgedDecision MakingFemaleGynecological ExaminationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInterviews as TopicMiddle AgedYoung Adultpatient preferencespatient viewprofessional society recommendationroutine pelvic examination

Identifiers

PMID28528899
PMCPMC6434937
OpenAlexW2614206466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.