ArticleThe New England journal of medicine2017
Time to Treatment and Mortality during Mandated Emergency Care for Sepsis.
Article in The New England journal of medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1,043 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Hemodynamic Resuscitation and Monitoring in Early Sepsis
Veno-arterial Carbon Dioxide Partial Pressure Difference (CO2gap) for Early Resuscitation of Septic Shock: A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Trial (CARBON)
Who cites it
1,043 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 2,140 citations in OpenAlex.
- Alerts and Alarms-Can Electronic Medical Records Help Children and Adolescents Survive Sepsis?Journal of paediatrics and child health · 2026Pooled it
- European stroke organisation guideline on stroke-associated pneumonia.European stroke journal · 2026Guideline
- Evaluating Artificial Intelligence for Sepsis Prediction in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis.Journal of medical systems · 2026Pooled it
- Effect of antibiotic regimens for bloodstream infections caused by KPC-producing enterobacter: a network meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Prognostic value of NLR, SII, PCT, and PLR in sepsis and septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- [S3 guideline on sepsis-prevention, diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up care-update 2025].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025Guideline
- The Effect of Early Warning Systems for Sepsis on Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Effect of acute kidney injury care bundles on patient prognosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC nephrology · 2025Pooled it
- Appropriate timing of antibiotic initiation in patients with sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Research without prior consent procedure and intervention effect on mortality in critical care: a meta-epidemiological study of randomized controlled trials.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Diagnostic performance and antibiotic impact of droplet digital PCR in suspected sepsis: the PROGRESS trial.Nature communications · 2026Trial
- Effects of a clinical metagenomics intervention on clinical outcomes, healthcare costs, and health-related quality of life in patients with sepsis or septic shock: results of the randomized-controlled DigiSep trial.Intensive care medicine · 2026Trial
- Procalcitonin testing combined with NEWS2 evaluation compared with usual care based on NEWS2 for identification of sepsis and antibiotic initiation in the emergency department in England and Wales (PRONTO): a multicentre, randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial.The Lancet. Respiratory medicine · 2026Trial
- Lessons Learned from Sepsis Microlearning Intervention.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Trial
- From early recognition to precision medicine: advances in the diagnosis and management of adult sepsis and septic shock-a narrative review.Infection · 2026Review
- Benchmarking four commercial antimicrobial susceptibility testing systems and disk diffusion to reference broth microdilution in the assessment of gram-negative bacterial isolates.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2026Article
- Time to Antibiotics and Mortality in Immunocompromised Versus Non-immunocompromised Patients With Suspected Sepsis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026Article
- Time to Effective Antibiotic Therapy and Clinical Outcomes in Bloodstream Infections With ESBL-Producing Enterobacterales: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Sepsis Diagnostic Excellence: Development and Validation of a Theoretical Framework for Conceptualizing Accurate, Timely Sepsis Diagnosis.Critical care explorations · 2026Observational
- Timely access to computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in acute critical conditions: clinical and health system outcomes. A scoping review.Emergency radiology · 2026Article
983 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn 2013, New York began requiring hospitals to follow protocols for the early identification and treatment of sepsis. However, there is controversy about whether more rapid treatment of sepsis improves outcomes in patients.
methodsWe studied data from patients with sepsis and septic shock that were reported to the New York State Department of Health from April 1, 2014, to June 30, 2016. Patients had a sepsis protocol initiated within 6 hours after arrival in the emergency department and had all items in a 3-hour bundle of care for patients with sepsis (i.e., blood cultures, broad-spectrum antibiotic agents, and lactate measurement) completed within 12 hours. Multilevel models were used to assess the associations between the time until completion of the 3-hour bundle and risk-adjusted mortality. We also examined the times to the administration of antibiotics and to the completion of an initial bolus of intravenous fluid.
resultsAmong 49,331 patients at 149 hospitals, 40,696 (82.5%) had the 3-hour bundle completed within 3 hours. The median time to completion of the 3-hour bundle was 1.30 hours (interquartile range, 0.65 to 2.35), the median time to the administration of antibiotics was 0.95 hours (interquartile range, 0.35 to 1.95), and the median time to completion of the fluid bolus was 2.56 hours (interquartile range, 1.33 to 4.20). Among patients who had the 3-hour bundle completed within 12 hours, a longer time to the completion of the bundle was associated with higher risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 1.04 per hour; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02 to 1.05; P<0.001), as was a longer time to the administration of antibiotics (odds ratio, 1.04 per hour; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.06; P<0.001) but not a longer time to the completion of a bolus of intravenous fluids (odds ratio, 1.01 per hour; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.02; P=0.21).
conclusionsMore rapid completion of a 3-hour bundle of sepsis care and rapid administration of antibiotics, but not rapid completion of an initial bolus of intravenous fluids, were associated with lower risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.