ReviewVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2017
Immunogenomics: using genomics to personalize cancer immunotherapy.
Review in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Case Report: Tail-of-the-curve advantage from immune checkpoint inhibitor-anti-VEGF combination therapy: extended survival in a patient with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- The Identification and Clinical Applications of Mutated Antigens in the Era of Immunotherapy.Cancers · 2022Review
- Recent Advances of Gold Compounds in Anticancer Immunity.Frontiers in chemistry · 2020Review
- The RA-MAP Consortium: a working model for academia-industry collaboration.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While the use of genomic data has the potential to revolutionize patient care, there is still much work to be done with regard to the transformation of host-tumor interactions into favorable clinical outcomes for our patients. High-throughput technologies, such as next-generation sequencing (NGS), have rapidly advanced our understanding of oncology, and we are learning that most tumors do not simply possess consistently mutated genes that are responsible for tumorigenesis, facilitating the need for personalized cancer therapy. A T cell-dependent mechanism of cancer progression was discovered in 2012, providing a potential link to cancer immunotherapy. Since then, an antibody against cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated molecule-4 (CTLA-4), ipilimumab, and three programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitors, pembrolizumab (Keytruda), nivolumab (Opdivo), and atezolizumab (Tecentriq), were approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the USA. In this review article, based on evidence that has been emerging in the literature over the last decade, we will discuss the basis for including genomic data in immunotherapy regimens, the current progress in identifying biomarkers targetable by immune checkpoint blockade, and the application of these therapies in modern oncology programs. Going forward, the clinical application of NGS in personalized oncology programs could include dose monitoring and adjustment or the development of individualized vaccines or other personalized therapies based on the mutational landscape. The continued identification of new neoantigens and the efficient mobilization of tumor-reactive lymphocytes in patients with cancer will promote the advancement of immunotherapy using personalized NGS-guided technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.