Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28528344›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2017

Dysnatremia is an Independent Indicator of Mortality in Hospitalized Patients.

Jiachang Hu, Yimei Wang, Xuemei Geng, Rongyi Chen, Pan Zhang, Jing Lin, Jie Teng, Xiaoyan Zhang, Xiaoqiang Ding

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jiachang HuDivision of Nephrology, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China (mainland).
Yimei WangDivision of Nephrology, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China (mainland).
Xuemei GengDivision of Nephrology, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China (mainland).
Rongyi ChenDivision of Nephrology, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China (mainland).
Pan ZhangDivision of Nephrology, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China (mainland).
Jing LinDivision of Nephrology, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China (mainland).
Jie TengDivision of Nephrology, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China (mainland).
Xiaoyan ZhangDivision of Nephrology, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China (mainland).
Xiaoqiang DingDivision of Nephrology, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China (mainland).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Dysnatremia is a risk factor for poor outcomes. We aimed to describe the prevalence and outcomes of various dysnatremia in hospitalized patients. High-risk patients must be identified to improve the prognosis of dysnatremia. MATERIAL AND METHODS This prospective study included all adult patients admitted consecutively to a university hospital between October 1, 2014 and September 30, 2015. RESULTS All 90 889 patients were included in this study. According to the serum sodium levels during hospitalization, the incidence of hyponatremia and hypernatremia was 16.8% and 1.9%, respectively. Mixed dysnatremia, which was defined when both hyponatremia and hypernatremia happened in the same patient during hospitalization, took place in 0.3% of patients. The incidence of dysnatremia was different in various underlying diseases. Multiple logistic regression analyses showed that all kinds of dysnatremia were independently associated with hospital mortality. The following dysnatremias were strong predictors of hospital mortality: mixed dysnatremia (OR 22.344, 95% CI 15.709-31.783, P=0.000), hypernatremia (OR 13.387, 95% CI 10.642-16.840, P=0.000), and especially hospital-acquired (OR 16.216, 95% CI 12.588-20.888, P=0.000) and persistent (OR 22.983, 95% CI 17.554-30.092, P=0.000) hypernatremia. Hyponatremia was also a risk factor for hospital mortality (OR 2.225, 95% CI 1.857-2.667). However, the OR increased to 56.884 (95% CI 35.098-92.193) if hyponatremia was over-corrected to hypernatremia. CONCLUSIONS Dysnatremia was independently associated with poor outcomes. Hospital-acquired and persistent hypernatremia were strong risk factors for hospital mortality. Effective prevention and proper correction of dysnatremia in high-risk patients may reduce the hospital mortality.

Indexed as

Hospital MortalityAgedDemographyFemaleHospitalizationHumansHypernatremiaHyponatremiaIncidenceKaplan-Meier EstimateLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRisk FactorsSodiumSodium

Identifiers

PMID28528344
PMCPMC5447666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.