ArticleAnalytical biochemistry2017
Radiative decay engineering 8: Coupled emission microscopy for lens-free high-throughput fluorescence detection.
Article in Analytical biochemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Photonic crystal band edge coupled enhanced fluorescence from magneto-plasmonic cryosoret nano-assemblies for ultra-sensitive detection.APL materials · 2025Article
- Review of Gold Nanoparticles in Surface Plasmon-Coupled Emission Technology: Effect of Shape, Hollow Nanostructures, Nano-Assembly, Metal-Dielectric and Heterometallic Nanohybrids.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Biosensing Technologies: A Focus Review on Recent Advancements in Surface Plasmon Coupled Emission.Micromachines · 2023Review
- Fabrication and application of a wireless high-definition endoscopic system in urological surgeries.BJU international · 2023Article
- Fluorescence Coupling to Internal Modes of 1D Photonic Crystals Characterized by Back Focal Plane Imaging.Journal of optics (2010) · 2021Article
- Imaging optical fields below metal films and metal-dielectric waveguides by a scanning microscope.Journal of applied physics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fluorescence spectroscopy and imaging are now used throughout the biosciences. Fluorescence microscopes, spectrofluorometers, microwell plate readers and microarray imagers all use multiple optical components to collect, redirect and focus the emission onto single point or array imaging detectors. For almost all biological samples, except those with regular nanoscale features, emission occurs in all directions. With the exception of complex microscope objectives with large collection angles (NA ≤ 0.5), all these instruments collect only a small fraction of the total emission. Because of the increasing knowledge base on fluorophores within near-field (<200 nm) distances from plasmonic and photonic structures we can anticipate the development of compact devices in which the sample to be detected is located directly on solid state detectors such as CCDs or CMOS cameras. Near-field interactions of fluorophores with metallic or dielectric multi-layer structures (MLSs) can capture a large fraction of the total emission. Depending on the composition and dimensions of the MLSs, the spatial distribution of the sample emission results in distinct optical patterns on the detector surface. With either plain glass slides or MLSs the most commonly used front focal plane (FFP) images reveal the x-y spatial distribution of emission from the sample. Another approach, which is often used with two or three-dimensional nanostructures, is back focal plane (BFP) imaging. The BFP images reveal the angular distribution of the emission. The FFP and BFP images occur at certain distances from the sample which is determined by the details of the optical components. Obtaining these images requires multiple optical components and distances which are too large for the compact devices. For devices described in this paper, the images will be detected at a fixed distance between the sample and some arbitrary distance below the MLS which is determined by the geometry and thicknesses of the components. We refer to measurements at these locations as out-of-focal plane (OFP) imaging. Herein we describe a method to measure the optical fields at micron and multi-micron distances below the MLS, which will represent the images seen by an optically coupled array detector. The possibility of sub-surface optical images is illustrated using five different multi-layer structures. This is accomplished using an optical configuration which allows measurement at a front focal plane (FFP), back focal plane (BFP) or any OFP locations. Our OFP imaging method provides a link between the FFP images which reveals the surface distribution of fluorophores with the BFP images that reveal the angular distribution of emission. This linkage can be useful when examining structures which have nanoscale features due to fluorescence or leakage radiation from nanostructures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.