Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28527129›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of hematology2017

Efficacy and safety of plerixafor for the mobilization/collection of peripheral hematopoietic stem cells for autologous transplantation in Japanese patients with multiple myeloma.

Masaki Ri, Kosei Matsue, Kazutaka Sunami, Chihiro Shimazaki, Akio Hayashi, Yoshinori Sunaga, Toru Sasaki, Kenshi Suzuki

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of hematology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. [Biological characteristics of sheep peripheral blood mesenchymal stem cell].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Masaki RiDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Nagoya City University Hospital, 1-Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan. rrmasaki@ybb.ne.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9617-486X
Kosei MatsueDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, Japan.
Kazutaka SunamiDepartment of Hematology, National Hospital Organization Okayama Medical Center, Okayama, Japan.
Chihiro ShimazakiDepartment of Hematology, Japan Community Health care Organization Kyoto Kuramaguchi Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan.
Akio HayashiSanofi K.K., Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshinori SunagaSanofi K.K., Tokyo, Japan.
Toru SasakiSanofi K.K., Tokyo, Japan.
Kenshi SuzukiDepartment of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of plerixafor for the mobilization/collection of peripheral hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) for autologous transplantation in Japanese patients with multiple myeloma (MM). In a randomized study, patients received G-CSF (filgrastim, 400 µg/m

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell MobilizationPeripheral Blood Stem Cell TransplantationAdultAgedAsian PeopleAutograftsBenzylaminesCyclamsFilgrastimHeterocyclic CompoundsHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaBenzylaminesCyclamsFilgrastimHeterocyclic CompoundsplerixaforApheresisG-CSFMultiple myelomaPlerixaforStem cell

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.