Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28527009›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2017

The Simpson grading in meningioma surgery: does the tumor location influence the prognostic value?

Kira Marie Voß, Dorothee Cäcilia Spille, Cristina Sauerland, Eric Suero Molina, Caroline Brokinkel, Werner Paulus, Walter Stummer, Markus Holling, Astrid Jeibmann, Benjamin Brokinkel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Review

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kira Marie VoßDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building A1, 48149, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
Dorothee Cäcilia SpilleDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building A1, 48149, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
Cristina SauerlandInstitute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University Hospital Münster, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
Eric Suero MolinaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building A1, 48149, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
Caroline BrokinkelDepartment of Clinical Radiology, University of Münster, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
Werner PaulusInstitute of Neuropathology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
Walter StummerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building A1, 48149, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
Markus HollingDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building A1, 48149, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
Astrid JeibmannInstitute of Neuropathology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
Benjamin BrokinkelDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building A1, 48149, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. benjamin.brokinkel@ukmuenster.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3462-3479

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In meningiomas, location-specific differences of the prognostic value of the Simpson classification are sparsely investigated but can influence strategy of surgery. We therefore compared the prognostic value of the Simpson classification in different tumor locations. Progression was compared with Simpson grade in 826 meningioma patients (median age 58 years, female:male ratio 2.4) in location-specific uni- and multivariate analyses. Simpson grade strongly correlated with tumor location (p < .001). Within a median follow-up of 50 months, recurrence was observed in 107 of 803 patients (13%). In general, increasing Simpson grade (p = .002) and subtotal resection (STR, ≥grade III) were correlated with tumor recurrence [hazard ratio (HR): 1.87; p = .004]. In 268 convexity meningiomas, frequency of tumor recurrence correlated with Simpson grade (p = .034). Risk of recurrence was similar after grade I and II resections, tended to increase after grade III (HR: 2.35; p = .087) but was higher after grade IV resections (HR: 7.35; p = .003). Risk of recurrence was higher after STR (HR: 4.21; p = .001) than after gross total resection (GTR, ≤grade II). Contrarily, increasing Simpson grade and STR were not correlated with progression in 102 falx, 38 posterior fossa and nine intraventricular meningiomas. In 325 skull base lesions, risk of recurrence was similar after GTR and STR (p = .198) and was only increased after grade IV resections (HR: 3.26; p = .017). Simpson grading and extent of resection were not equally prognostic in all locations. Lower impact of extent of resection should be considered during surgery for skull base, posterior fossa and falx meningiomas.

Indexed as

Neoplasm GradingAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildDisease ProgressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeurosurgical ProceduresLocationMeningiomaPrognosisResectionSimpson classification

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.