Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28526805›Full record

SynthesisOncotarget2017

Evaluation of crescent formation as a predictive marker in immunoglobulin A nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xue Shao, Bingjue Li, Luxi Cao, Ludan Liang, Jingjuan Yang, Yucheng Wang, Shi Feng, Cuili Wang, Chunhua Weng, Xiujin Shen and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Crescents and IgA Nephropathy: A Delicate Marriage.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xue ShaoKidney Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Bingjue LiKidney Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Luxi CaoKidney Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Ludan LiangKidney Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Jingjuan YangKidney Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Yucheng WangKidney Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Shi FengKidney Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Cuili WangKidney Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Chunhua WengKidney Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Xiujin ShenKidney Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Hong JiangKidney Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Jianghua ChenKidney Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Zhejiang University · CNState Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of the People's Republic of China · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 2009 Oxford Classification of immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy (IgAN) identifies four histological features as predictors of renal prognosis: mesangial hypercellularity (M), endocapillary hypercellularity (E), segmental glomerulosclerosis (S), and tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis (T). However, the clinical and prognostic significance of crescent formation still remains controversial. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the association between crescents and kidney outcome in IgAN. A total of 20 studies published from January 2009 to July 2016 involving 5,285 patients were included after systematic searches of PubMed and EMBASE databases. Pooled results showed that crescent lesions were associated with kidney failure (HR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.49-2.50; P < 0.001). IgAN patients with crescents had lower eGFR levels (SMD, -0.21; 95% CI, -0.40--0.03; P = 0.023); higher proteinuria levels (SMD, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.11-1.63; P = 0.024); a larger number of patients with M1 (RR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.07-1.40; P = 0.003), E1 (RR, 4.83; 95% CI, 3.04-7.66;P < 0.001), S1 (RR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.11-2.80; P = 0.016) and T1/2 (RR, 2.74; 95% CI, 2.10-3.57; P < 0.001) lesions; and received immunosuppressive therapy more frequently (RD, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.11-0.23; P < 0.001). Our results suggest that crescent formation represents an efficient prognostic factor associated with progression to kidney failure and thus could be considered into the new Oxford Classification.

Indexed as

BiomarkersComorbidityDisease ProgressionGlomerular Filtration RateGlomerulonephritis, IGAHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsKidney GlomerulusOdds RatioPatient Outcome AssessmentPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsPublication BiasBiomarkersImmunosuppressive Agentscrescent lesionsImmunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathymeta-analysisoxford classification

Identifiers

PMID28526805
PMCPMC5542279
OpenAlexW2610158815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.