Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28526795›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2017

Exploring a Possible Link between the Intestinal Microbiota and Feed Efficiency in Pigs.

Ursula M McCormack, Tânia Curião, Stefan G Buzoianu, Maria L Prieto, Tomas Ryan, Patrick Varley, Fiona Crispie, Elizabeth Magowan, Barbara U Metzler-Zebeli, Donagh Berry and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 177 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
177citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

177 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Influence of Different Litter Regimens on Ceca Microbiota Profiles inAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Effects of Dietary High-Yield ProteaseAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article

117 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ursula M McCormackTeagasc, Pig Development Department, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, County Cork, Ireland.
Tânia CuriãoTeagasc, Pig Development Department, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, County Cork, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5269-0387
Stefan G BuzoianuTeagasc, Pig Development Department, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, County Cork, Ireland.
Maria L PrietoDepartment of Science, Waterford Institute of Technology, Waterford, Ireland.
Tomas RyanTeagasc, Pig Development Department, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, County Cork, Ireland.
Patrick VarleyHermitage Genetics, County Kilkenny, Ireland.
Fiona CrispieTeagasc, Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, County Cork, Ireland.
Elizabeth MagowanAgri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough, Northern Ireland.
Barbara U Metzler-ZebeliDepartment of Farm Animals and Veterinary Public Health, University Clinic for Swine, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.
Donagh BerryTeagasc, Animal and Bioscience Research Department, Animal and Grassland Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, County Cork, Ireland.
Orla O'SullivanTeagasc, Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, County Cork, Ireland.
Paul D CotterTeagasc, Food Research Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, County Cork, Ireland.
Gillian E GardinerDepartment of Science, Waterford Institute of Technology, Waterford, Ireland ggardiner@wit.ie.
Peadar G LawlorTeagasc, Pig Development Department, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, County Cork, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feed efficiency (FE) is critical in pig production for both economic and environmental reasons. As the intestinal microbiota plays an important role in energy harvest, it is likely to influence FE. Therefore, our aim was to characterize the intestinal microbiota of pigs ranked as low, medium, and high residual feed intake ([RFI] a metric for FE), where genetic, nutritional, and management effects were minimized, to explore a possible link between the intestinal microbiota and FE. Eighty-one pigs were ranked according to RFI between weaning and day 126 postweaning, and 32 were selected as the extremes in RFI (12 low, 10 medium, and 10 high). Intestinal microbiota diversity, composition, and predicted functionality were assessed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Although no differences in microbial diversity were found, some RFI-associated compositional differences were revealed, principally among members of

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimal FeedAnimalsBacteriaBiodiversityEatingFecesFemaleIntestinal MucosaIntestinesMalePhylogenySwinececumfecesileumresidual feed intakeswine

Identifiers

PMID28526795
PMCPMC5514681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.