Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28526667›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2017

Patient-Centered Decision Support: Formative Usability Evaluation of Integrated Clinical Decision Support With a Patient Decision Aid for Minor Head Injury in the Emergency Department.

Edward R Melnick, Erik P Hess, George Guo, Maggie Breslin, Kevin Lopez, Anthony J Pavlo, Fuad Abujarad, Seth M Powsner, Lori A Post

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Development of web- and mobile-based shared decision-making tools in the neurological intensive care unit.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Edward R MelnickDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6509-9537
Erik P HessDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6499-9592
George GuoYale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2924-7424
Maggie BreslinSchool of Visual Arts, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7800-6515
Kevin LopezDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2901-5674
Anthony J PavloDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9604-7097
Fuad AbujaradDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1195-6812
Seth M PowsnerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1153-015X
Lori A PostDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6261-3254
Yale University · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USNorthwestern University · USSchool of Visual Arts · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Clinical Decision Support for Mild Traumatic Brain InjuryK08HS021271 · AHRQ · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MELNICK, EDWARD ROBERT · 2013 to 2017
$772k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS021271
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Canadian Computed Tomography (CT) Head Rule, a clinical decision rule designed to safely reduce imaging in minor head injury, has been rigorously validated and implemented, and yet expected decreases in CT were unsuccessful. Recent work has identified empathic care as a key component in decreasing CT overuse. Health information technology can hinder the clinician-patient relationship. Patient-centered decision tools to support the clinician-patient relationship are needed to promote evidence-based decisions.

objectiveOur objective is to formatively evaluate an electronic tool that not only helps clinicians at the bedside to determine the need for CT use based on the Canadian CT Head Rule but also promotes evidence-based conversations between patients and clinicians regarding patient-specific risk and patients' specific concerns.

methodsUser-centered design with practice-based and participatory decision aid development was used to design, develop, and evaluate patient-centered decision support regarding CT use in minor head injury in the emergency department. User experience and user interface (UX/UI) development involved successive iterations with incremental refinement in 4 phases: (1) initial prototype development, (2) usability assessment, (3) field testing, and (4) beta testing. This qualitative approach involved input from patients, emergency care clinicians, health services researchers, designers, and clinical informaticists at every stage.

resultsThe Concussion or Brain Bleed app is the product of 16 successive iterative revisions in accordance with UX/UI industry design standards. This useful and usable final product integrates clinical decision support with a patient decision aid. It promotes shared use by emergency clinicians and patients at the point of care within the emergency department context. This tablet computer app facilitates evidence-based conversations regarding CT in minor head injury. It is adaptable to individual clinician practice styles. The resultant tool includes a patient injury evaluator based on the Canadian CT Head Rule and provides patient specific risks using pictographs with natural frequencies and cues for discussion about patient concerns.

conclusionsThis tool was designed to align evidence-based practices about CT in minor head injury patients. It establishes trust, empowers active participation, and addresses patient concerns and uncertainty about their condition. We hypothesize that, when implemented, the Concussion or Brain Bleed app will support-not hinder-the clinician-patient relationship, safely reduce CT use, and improve the patient experience of care.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalDecision Support TechniquesCraniocerebral TraumaEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleclinical decision supportdecision aidshead injury, minorhealth services overusemedical informaticspatient-centered outcomes researchspiral computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID28526667
PMCPMC5457532
OpenAlexW2616272524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.