Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28526093›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2017

Canine infection with Borrelia burgdorferi, Dirofilaria immitis, Anaplasma spp. and Ehrlichia spp. in Canada, 2013-2014.

Brian H Herrin, Andrew S Peregrine, Jonas Goring, Melissa J Beall, Susan E Little

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Circulation ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Invasive Mosquitoes of Canada: An Entomological, Medical, and Veterinary Review.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Defining important canine zoonotic pathogens within the Prairie Provinces of Canada.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Epidemiological and Clinicopathological Features ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Review
  11. Regional and Local Temporal Trends ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Under-Detection of Lyme Disease in Canada.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Article
  15. Serological survey of canine vector-borne diseases in Saskatchewan, Canada.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2018
    Article
  16. ACVIM consensus update on Lyme borreliosis in dogs and cats.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brian H HerrinDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, Center for Veterinary Health Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA. brian.h.herrin@okstate.edu.
Andrew S PeregrineDepartment of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Jonas GoringIDEXX Laboratories, Inc, Westbrook, ME, USA.
Melissa J BeallIDEXX Laboratories, Inc, Westbrook, ME, USA.
Susan E LittleDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, Center for Veterinary Health Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCanine test results generated by veterinarians throughout Canada from 2013-2014 were evaluated to assess the geographical distribution of canine infection with Borrelia burgdorferi, Dirofilaria immitis, Ehrlichia spp., and Anaplasma spp.

methodsThe percent positive test results of 115,636 SNAP® 4Dx® Plus tests from dogs tested were collated by province and municipality to determine the distribution of these vector-borne infections in Canada.

resultsA total of 2,844/115,636 (2.5%) dogs tested positive for antibody to B. burgdorferi. In contrast, positive test results for D. immitis antigen and antibodies to Ehrlichia spp. and Anaplasma spp. were low, with less than 0.5% of dogs testing positive for any one of these three agents nationwide. Provincial seroprevalence for antibodies to B. burgdorferi ranged from 0.5% (Saskatchewan)-15.7% (Nova Scotia); the areas of highest percent positive test results were in proximity to regions in the USA considered endemic for Lyme borreliosis, including Nova Scotia (15.7%) and Eastern Ontario (5.1%). These high endemic foci, which had significantly higher percent positive test results than the rest of the nation (P < 0.0001), were surrounded by areas of moderate to low seroprevalence in New Brunswick (3.7%), Quebec (2.8%), and the rest of Ontario (0.9%), as well as northward and westward through Manitoba (2.4%) and Saskatchewan (0.5%). Insufficient results were available from the westernmost provinces, including Alberta and British Columbia, to allow analysis.

conclusionIncreased surveillance of these vector-borne disease agents, especially B. burgdorferi, is important as climate, vector range, and habitat continues to change throughout Canada. Using dogs as sentinels for these pathogens can aid in recognition of the public and veterinary health threat that each pose.

Indexed as

AnaplasmaAnaplasmosisAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, HelminthBorrelia burgdorferiCanadaDirofilaria immitisDirofilariasisDog DiseasesDogsEhrlichiaEhrlichiosisLyme DiseaseReagent Kits, DiagnosticSeroepidemiologic StudiesAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, HelminthReagent Kits, DiagnosticAnaplasmaBorrelia burgdorferiCanadaCanineDirofilaria immitisEhrlichia

Identifiers

PMID28526093
PMCPMC5437676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.