ArticleBMC health services research2017
Influences on patient satisfaction in healthcare centers: a semi-quantitative study over 5 years.
Article in BMC health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Health system responsiveness: a systematic evidence mapping review of the global literature.International journal for equity in health · 2021Pooled it
- The influence of emergency physician gender on patient experience surveys.The American journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Patients' satisfaction in positron emission tomography/computed tomography departments in Gauteng province, South Africa.Health SA = SA Gesondheid · 2026Article
- Determinants of Asian Students' Medical Satisfaction in China: A Cross-Sectional Survey.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Addressing obstetric violence: a scoping review of interventions in healthcare and their impact on maternal care quality.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Article
- Healthcare Managers' Perception on Patient Safety Culture.Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare · 2023Article
- Mature Adults at the GP: Length of Visit and Patient Satisfaction-Associations with Patient, Doctor, and Facility Characteristics.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- Health insurance in private and public health facilities in Southwestern Nigeria: what determines clients´ satisfaction with quality of service?The Pan African medical journal · 2022Article
- Patient and Staff Satisfaction and Experience While Transforming Health Center Systems.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2022Article
- Obstetric Violence in Spain (Part III): Healthcare Professionals, Times, and Areas.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Health Investment Management and Healthcare Quality in the Public System: A Gender Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Does Emotional Intelligence of Dental Undergraduates Influence Their Patient Satisfaction?International journal of dentistry · 2021Article
- Patient Satisfaction With Heart Health Clinics in Fraser Health, Canada.Journal of patient experience · 2021Article
- The Influence of Transaction Process With Doctors on Patient Satisfaction, Self-Rating Anxiety and Self-Efficacy Among International Students in China.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- Combining Direct and Indirect Measurements to Assess Patients' Satisfaction with the Quality of Public Health Services in Romania: Uncovering Structural Mechanisms and Their Implications.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- Patient Satisfaction in the Spanish National Health Service: Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- Patients' ideas, concerns, expectations and satisfaction in primary health care - a questionnaire study of patients and health care professionals' perspectives.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2019Article
- Development of the Japanese version of the general practice assessment questionnaire: measurement of patient experience and testing of data quality.BMC family practice · 2018Article
- Patient and health professional satisfaction with an interdisciplinary patient safety program.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundKnowledge of ambulatory patients' satisfaction with clinic visits help improve communication and delivery of healthcare. The goal was to examine patient satisfaction in a primary care setting, identify how selected patient and physician setting and characteristics affected satisfaction, and determine if feedback provided to medical directors over time impacted patient satisfaction.
methodsA three-phase, semi-quantitative analysis was performed using anonymous, validated patient satisfaction surveys collected from 889 ambulatory outpatients in 6 healthcare centers over 5-years. Patients' responses to 21 questions were analyzed by principal components varimax rotated factor analysis. Three classifiable components emerged: Satisfaction with Physician, Availability/Convenience, and Orderly/Time. To study the effects of several independent variables (location of clinics, patients' and physicians' age, education level and duration at the clinic), data were subjected to multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA)..
resultsChanges in the healthcare centers over time were not significantly related to patient satisfaction. However, location of the center did affect satisfaction. Urban patients were more satisfied with their physicians than rural, and inner city patients were less satisfied than urban or rural on Availability/Convenience and less satisfied than urban patients on Orderly/Time. How long a patient attended a center most affected satisfaction, with patients attending >10 years more satisfied in all three components than those attending <1-5 years. Level of education affected patients' satisfaction only in the component Orderly/Time; patients without a high school education were significantly less satisfied than those with more. Patients in their 40's were significantly less satisfied in Availability/Convenience than those >60 years old. Patients were significantly more satisfied with their 30-40 year-old physicians compared with those over 60. On Orderly/Time, patients were more satisfied with physicians who were in their 50's than physicians >60.
conclusionsImprovement in patient satisfaction includes a need for immediate, specific feedback. Although Medical Directors received feedback yearly, we found no significant changes in patient satisfaction over time. Our results suggest that, to increase satisfaction, patients with lower education, those who are sicker, and those who are new to the center likely would benefit from additional high quality interactions with their physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.