Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28526026›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2017

A qualitative study of Telehealth patient information leaflets (TILs): are we giving patients enough information?

Reem Kayyali, Iman Hesso, Evelyn Ejiko, Shereen Nabhani Gebara

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Data Work: Meaning-Making in the Era of Data-Rich Medicine.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Reem KayyaliSchool of Life Sciences, Pharmacy and Chemistry, Kingston University London, Penrhyn Road, KT1 2EE, Kingston upon Thames, UK. R.kayyali@kingston.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7300-8738
Iman HessoSchool of Life Sciences, Pharmacy and Chemistry, Kingston University London, Penrhyn Road, KT1 2EE, Kingston upon Thames, UK.
Evelyn EjikoSchool of Life Sciences, Pharmacy and Chemistry, Kingston University London, Penrhyn Road, KT1 2EE, Kingston upon Thames, UK.
Shereen Nabhani GebaraSchool of Life Sciences, Pharmacy and Chemistry, Kingston University London, Penrhyn Road, KT1 2EE, Kingston upon Thames, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe provision of patient information leaflets regarding telehealth has been perceived by potential consumers as a strategy to promote awareness and adoption of telehealth services. However, such leaflets need to be designed carefully if adoption and awareness among potential users is to be promoted. Therefore, the aims of this study were: first, to see how telehealth was portrayed in some of the existing telehealth leaflets (THLs). Second, to explore patients' perceptions of the existing THLs and their engagement with the concept and how THLs can be optimised.

methodsA two-step approach was employed to address the aims of this study. The first phase involved the use of discourse analysis to compare 12 electronically and publically available THLs, with the existing THL guidance "Involve Yorkshire and Humber". The second phase involved conducting 14 semi-structured interviews with potential telehealth users/patients to gauge their perception and engagement with the concept, using the two leaflets that were mostly matching with the guidance used. Six interviews were audio-recorded and eight had detailed jotted notes. The interviews were transcribed and thematically analysed to identify key themes.

resultsThe discourse analysis showed certain gaps and variations within the screened leaflets when addressing the following aspects: cost of the telehealth service, confidentiality, patients' choices in addition to equipment use and technical support. Analysis of the interviews revealed patients' need for having clear and sufficient information about the telehealth service within the THLs; in addition to, patients' preference for the use of simpler terminologies for telehealth description and the provision of clear simple texts with pictorial presentations. The interviews also revealed certain limitations against adoption of telehealth by the participants, such as: lack of privacy and confidentiality of information, fear of technology breakdown and equipment failure, loss of face-to-face contact with healthcare professionals and being too dependent on the telehealth service.

conclusionThe current study showed a great variation among the screened THLs and highlighted certain gaps within the content and presentation of these leaflets. However, the study also highlighted certain key issues to be considered when designing THLs in the future to enhance telehealth uptake and use by patients.

Indexed as

PamphletsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChoice BehaviorConfidentialityFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansLength of StayLondonMaleMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicPatient SatisfactionQualitative ResearchDiscourse analysisPatients perceptionsTelehealthTelehealth guidanceTelehealth informationTelehealth leaflets

Identifiers

PMID28526026
PMCPMC5438507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.