Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28525293›Full record

ArticleJournal of women's health (2002)2017

Where Do Women Get Advice About Weight, Eating, and Physical Activity During Pregnancy?

Adrian Mercado, Becky Marquez, Barbara Abrams, Maureen G Phipps, Rena R Wing, Suzanne Phelan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of women's health (2002), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Sisters in Birth: Improving Birth Outcomes in Mississippi.The Journal of perinatal education · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. What the Health? Information Sources and Maternal Lifestyle Behaviors.Interactive journal of medical research · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Adrian Mercado1 Kinesiology Department, California Polytechnic State University , San Luis Obispo, California.
Becky Marquez2 Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California , San Diego, San Diego, California.
Barbara Abrams3 Epidemiology Division, School of Public Health, University of California , Berkeley, Berkeley, California.
Maureen G Phipps5 Division of Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University , Providence, Rhode Island.
Rena R Wing4 Department of Psychiatry, The Miriam Hospital, Weight Control and Diabetes Research Center, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University , Providence, Rhode Island.
Suzanne Phelan1 Kinesiology Department, California Polytechnic State University , San Luis Obispo, California.

Funding

Preventing excessive gestational weight gain in obese womenU01HL114377 · NHLBI · CALIFORNIA POLY STATE U SAN LUIS OBISPO · PI PHELAN, SUZANNE · 2011 to 2016
$4.5M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost women report not receiving information about gestational weight gain (GWG) from prenatal providers, but less is known about other sources of information and their potential impacts on GWG. The purpose of this study was to investigate sources of information about diet, physical activity, and weight control during pregnancy, and the impact of information sources on maternal GWG. MATERIALS AND

methodsParticipants were 183 women with normal weight and 172 women with overweight/obesity who had enrolled in a prenatal lifestyle intervention trial. At 6 weeks postpartum, women were asked whether they had received information about "diet, physical activity, or weight control" from 12 sources uninvolved in the trial (e.g., physician, Internet, and friend) and, if received, the extent to which they followed the advice. Information sources were examined in relation to odds of exceeding Institute of Medicine (IOM) GWG guidelines based on measured weights.

resultsMost women reported receiving information from a book (60.6%) or the Internet (58.3%). Advice from physicians, dietitians, or nurses was reported in 55.6%, 48.2%, and 33.9% of women, respectively. Reported receipt of information from physicians was associated with reduced Odds Ratio ([95% Confidence Interval] = 0.55 [0.35-0.88]; p = 0.01) of exceeding IOM GWG guidelines. Reported receipt of information from other sources was not related to GWG.

conclusionsBooks and the Internet were the most prevalent information sources reported for prenatal diet, physical activity, and weight control. However, of all sources, only physician provision of information was associated with reduced odds of excessive GWG.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeInformation Seeking BehaviorPrenatal EducationWeight GainAdultCounselingFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansObesityOverweightPatient Education as TopicPregnancyPregnant PeopleSocioeconomic Factorsgestational weight gainIOM recommendationspractitioner adviceprenatal advice

Identifiers

PMID28525293
PMCPMC5649418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.