Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28524744›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on therapeutic targets2017

Sphingosine 1-phosphate signaling in bone remodeling: multifaceted roles and therapeutic potential.

Anastasia Meshcheryakova, Diana Mechtcheriakova, Peter Pietschmann

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on therapeutic targets, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. The Ying and Yang of Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Signalling within the Bone.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anastasia Meshcheryakovaa Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology , Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria.
Diana Mechtcheriakovaa Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology , Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-8737-3592
Peter Pietschmanna Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology , Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 23228
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSphingolipids belong to a complex class of lipid molecules that are crucially involved in the regulation of important biological processes including proliferation, migration and apoptosis. Given the significant progress made in understanding the sphingolipid pathobiology of several diseases, sphingolipid-related checkpoints emerge as attractive targets. Recent data indicate the multifaceted contribution of the sphingolipid machinery to osteoclast - osteoblast crosstalk, representing one of the pivotal interactions underlying bone homeostasis. Imbalances in the interplay of osteoblasts and osteoclasts might lead to bone-related diseases such as osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and bone metastases. Areas covered: We summarize and analyze the progress made in bone research in the context of the current knowledge of sphingolipid-related mechanisms regulating bone remodeling. Particular emphasis was given to bioactive sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) and S1P receptors (S1PRs). Moreover, the mechanisms of how dysregulations of this machinery cause bone diseases, are covered. Expert opinion: In the context of bone diseases, pharmacological interference with sphingolipid machinery may lead to novel directions in therapeutic strategies. Implementation of knowledge derived from in vivo animal models and in vitro studies using pharmacological agents to manipulate the S1P/S1PRs axes suggests S1PR2 and S1PR3 as potential drug targets, particularly in conjunction with technology for local drug delivery.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone and BonesBone DiseasesBone RemodelingDrug Delivery SystemsDrug DesignHumansLysophospholipidsOsteoblastsOsteoclastsReceptors, LysosphingolipidSignal TransductionSphingolipidsSphingosineSphingosine-1-Phosphate ReceptorsLysophospholipidsReceptors, LysosphingolipidS1PR2 protein, humanSphingolipidsSphingosinesphingosine 1-phosphatesphingosine-1-phosphate receptor-3, humanSphingosine-1-Phosphate ReceptorsBone biologybone diseasescoupling factorosteoclast – osteoblast crosstalkosteoporosisosteotropic therapiessphingolipid-related checkpointssphingosine 1-phosphatesphingosine 1-phosphate receptor antagonist/agonist

Identifiers

PMID28524744
PMCPMC5470107
OpenAlexW2616346761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.