Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28524723›Full record

ArticleNucleus (Austin, Tex.)2017

L1 retrotransposition is activated by Ten-eleven-translocation protein 1 and repressed by methyl-CpG binding proteins.

Peng Zhang, Anne K Ludwig, Florian D Hastert, Cathia Rausch, Anne Lehmkuhl, Ines Hellmann, Martha Smets, Heinrich Leonhardt, M Cristina Cardoso

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleus (Austin, Tex.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. DysregulatedCancers · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. SIRT6 Through the Brain Evolution, Development, and Aging.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Post-transcriptional regulation of LINE-1 retrotransposition by AID/APOBEC and ADAR deaminases.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2018
    Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Peng Zhanga Department of Biology , Technical University Darmstadt , Darmstadt , Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3683-3752
Anne K Ludwiga Department of Biology , Technical University Darmstadt , Darmstadt , Germany.
Florian D Hasterta Department of Biology , Technical University Darmstadt , Darmstadt , Germany.
Cathia Rauscha Department of Biology , Technical University Darmstadt , Darmstadt , Germany.
Anne Lehmkuhla Department of Biology , Technical University Darmstadt , Darmstadt , Germany.
Ines Hellmannb Anthropology and Human Genomics, Department Biology II , LMU Munich , Germany.
Martha Smetsc Human Biology and BioImaging, Department of Biology II , LMU Munich , Germany.
Heinrich Leonhardtc Human Biology and BioImaging, Department of Biology II , LMU Munich , Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5086-6449
M Cristina Cardosoa Department of Biology , Technical University Darmstadt , Darmstadt , Germany.
Technische Universität Darmstadt · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the major functions of DNA methylation is the repression of transposable elements, such as the long-interspersed nuclear element 1 (L1). The underlying mechanism(s), however, are unclear. Here, we addressed how retrotransposon activation and mobilization are regulated by methyl-cytosine modifying ten-eleven-translocation (Tet) proteins and how this is modulated by methyl-CpG binding domain (MBD) proteins. We show that Tet1 activates both, endogenous and engineered L1 retrotransposons. Furthermore, we found that Mecp2 and Mbd2 repress Tet1-mediated activation of L1 by preventing 5hmC formation at the L1 promoter. Finally, we demonstrate that the methyl-CpG binding domain, as well as the adjacent non-sequence specific DNA binding domain of Mecp2 are each sufficient to mediate repression of Tet1-induced L1 mobilization. Our study reveals a mechanism how L1 elements get activated in the absence of Mecp2 and suggests that Tet1 may contribute to Mecp2/Mbd2-deficiency phenotypes, such as the Rett syndrome. We propose that the balance between methylation "reader" and "eraser/writer" controls L1 retrotransposition.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell LineDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Transposable ElementsHumansMethyl-CpG-Binding Protein 2MiceMixed Function OxygenasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Transposable ElementsMBD2 proteinMethyl-CpG-Binding Protein 2Mixed Function OxygenasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsTET1 protein, human5-hydroxymethylcytosineDNA methylationgenome stabilityrepetitive elementsRett syndrome

Identifiers

PMID28524723
PMCPMC5703239
OpenAlexW2614288756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.