Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28523465›Full record

ArticleThe patient2017

Development and Validation of a Cross-Country Hospital Patient Quality of Care Assessment Tool in Europe.

Amanda Villiers-Tuthill, Karolina Doulougeri, Hannah McGee, Anthony Montgomery, Efharis Panagopoulou, Karen Morgan

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The patient, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amanda Villiers-TuthillDivision of Population Health Sciences, Department of Psychology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Karolina DoulougeriDepartment of Educational and Social Policy, University of Macedonia, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Hannah McGeeFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Anthony MontgomeryDepartment of Educational and Social Policy, University of Macedonia, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Efharis PanagopoulouMedical School, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Karen MorganDivision of Population Health Sciences, Department of Psychology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland. karenmorgan@perdanauniversity.edu.my.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6193-1747

Funding

FP7-HEALTH-2009-single-stage grant agreement no. [242084].
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient perceptions of quality of care (QoC) are directly linked with patient safety and clinical effectiveness. We need patient-designed QoC instruments that work across languages and countries to optimise studies across systems in this area. Few QoC measurement tools exist that assess all aspects of QoC from the patient perspective. This paper describes the development and validation of a comprehensive measure to assess patient perceptions of QoC that incorporates technical and interpersonal aspects of care and is grounded in the established Institute of Medicine (IOM) QoC framework.

designWe conducted a multi-country cross-sectional study.

methodsFollowing a literature review and patient focus groups, an expert panel generated questionnaire items. Following a pilot study, item numbers were reduced. The final questionnaire consisted of three sections: demographics, perceived QoC and one open-ended question. Data was collected from patients (n = 531) discharged from hospitals across seven countries in South East Europe (languages: Turkish, Greek, Portuguese, Romanian, Croatian, Macedonian and Bulgarian). Reliability and validity of the measure were assessed.

resultsConfirmatory factor analysis was used to compare various factor models of patient-perceived QoC. Good model fit was demonstrated for a two-factor model: communication and interpersonal care, and hospital facilities.

conclusionsThe ORCAB (Improving quality and safety in the hospital: The link between organisational culture, burnout and quality of care) Patient QoC questionnaire has been collaboratively and exhaustively developed between healthcare professionals and patients. It enables patient QoC data to be assessed in the context of the IOM pillars of quality, considering both technical and interpersonal dimensions of care. It represents an important first step in including the patient perspective.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHospital AdministrationHumansInpatientsInternationalityLanguageMaleMiddle AgedPatient SafetyPerceptionPilot Projects

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.