Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28523392›Full record

ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2017

Brief Report: Autism in the Courtroom: Experiences of Legal Professionals and the Autism Community.

Katie L Maras, Laura Crane, Sue Mulcahy, Tamsyn Hawken, Penny Cooper, David Wurtzel, Amina Memon

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Mock juror perceptions of an adult autistic witness: effect of diagnostic label and witness intermediary presence.Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Defendants with intellectual disability and autism spectrum conditions: the perspective of clinicians working across three jurisdictions.Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2022
    Article
  8. Autistic adults and their experiences with police personnel: a qualitative inquiry.Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2022
    Article
  9. Mock Juror Perceptions of Credibility and Culpability in an Autistic Defendant.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Katie L MarasUniversity of Bath, Bath, UK.
Laura CraneGoldsmiths, University of London, London, UK. l.crane@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4161-3490
Sue MulcahyUniversity of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Tamsyn HawkenUniversity of Bath, Bath, UK.
Penny CooperBirkbeck, University of London, London, UK.
David WurtzelCity University London, London, EC1V 0HB, UK.
Amina MemonRoyal Holloway, University of London, Egham, UK.
City, University of London · GBUniversity of Bath · GBBirkbeck, University of London · GBRoyal Holloway University of London · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Online surveys were used to sample the views of judges, barristers and solicitors (n = 33) about their engagement with autistic individuals in criminal courts in England and Wales. Despite an understanding of some of the difficulties experienced by individuals with autism, and the adjustments suitable for supporting them, legal professionals reported constraints arising from a lack of understanding by others within the criminal justice system. These results are considered alongside the views and perspectives of autistic adults (n = 9) and parents of children on the autism spectrum (n = 19), who had encountered the criminal courts as witnesses or defendants and were largely dissatisfied with their experiences. Training, understanding and the provision of appropriate adjustments were identified as key issues by all respondent groups.

Indexed as

Judicial RoleAdultAutistic DisorderChildComprehensionEnglandFemaleHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesWalesAutismCourtsCriminal justiceDisabilityLawSolicitors

Identifiers

PMID28523392
OpenAlexW2616658879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.