Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28523355›Full record

Trial reportEuropean radiology2017

MRI findings in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer: does dutasteride make MRI visible lesions less conspicuous? Results from a placebo-controlled, randomised clinical trial.

Francesco Giganti, Caroline M Moore, Nicola L Robertson, Neil McCartan, Charles Jameson, Simon R J Bott, Mathias Winkler, Giulio Gambarota, Brandon Whitcher, Ramiro Castro and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Francesco GigantiDepartment of Radiology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, UK. f.giganti@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5218-6431
Caroline M MooreDivision of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Nicola L RobertsonDivision of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Neil McCartanDivision of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Charles JamesonDepartment of Pathology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Simon R J BottDepartment of Urology, Frimley Park Hospital, Surrey, UK.
Mathias WinklerDepartment of Urology, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK.
Giulio GambarotaINSERM, U1099, Rennes, F-35000, France.
Brandon WhitcherKlarismo, London, UK.
Ramiro CastroResearch and Development, GlaxoSmithKline, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Mark EmbertonDivision of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Clare AllenDepartment of Radiology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, UK.
Alex KirkhamDepartment of Radiology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, UK.
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBCharing Cross Hospital · GBFrimley Park Hospital · GBGlaxoSmithKline (United States) · USImperial College London · GBInserm · FRUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Department of Health 09/22/67
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate changes in the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer taking dutasteride 0.5 mg or placebo.

methodsWe analysed 37 men, randomised to 6 months of daily dutasteride (n = 18) or placebo (n = 19), undergoing 3T multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) scans at baseline and 6 months. Images were reviewed blind to treatment allocation and clinical information. Mean ADC of peripheral (PZ) and transition (TZ) zones, and MR-suspicious lesions were compared between groups over 6 months. Conspicuity was defined as the PZ divided by tumour ADC, and its change over 6 months was assessed.

resultsA decrease in mean conspicuity in the dutasteride group (but not the controls) was seen over 6 months (1.54 vs 1.38; p = 0.025). Absolute changes in ADC and conspicuity were significantly different between placebo and dutasteride groups at 6 months: (-0.03 vs 0.08, p = 0.033) and (0.11 vs -0.16, p = 0.012), as were percentage changes in the same parameters: (-2.27% vs 8.56% p = 0.048) and (9.25% vs -9.89% p = 0.013).

conclusionsDutasteride was associated with increased tumour ADC and reduced conspicuity. A lower threshold for triggering biopsy might be considered in men on dutasteride undergoing mpMRI for prostate cancer. KEY POINTS: • Dutasteride increases ADC and reduces conspicuity in small mpMRI-visible prostate cancers. • Knowledge of dutasteride exposure is important in the interpretation of prostate mpMRI. • A lower threshold for triggering biopsy may be appropriate on dutasteride.

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging5-alpha Reductase InhibitorsAgedBiopsyDutasterideHumansMaleMiddle AgedProstatic HyperplasiaProstatic Neoplasms5-alpha Reductase InhibitorsDutasterideDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingDutasterideMolecular ImagingPlaceboProstatic neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID28523355
PMCPMC5635085
OpenAlexW2615565368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.