Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28523224›Full record

SynthesisBrain and behavior2017

The treatment methods for post-stroke visual impairment: A systematic review.

Kerry Louise Hanna, Lauren Rachel Hepworth, Fiona J Rowe

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Brain and behavior, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Interventions for perceptual disorders following stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Audio-visual stimulation for visual compensatory functions in stroke survivors with visual field defect: a systematic review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Validation of the brain injury associated visual impairment - impact questionnaire (BIVI-IQ).Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kerry Louise HannaDepartment of Health Services Research University of Liverpool Liverpool UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7357-7749
Lauren Rachel HepworthDepartment of Health Services Research University of Liverpool Liverpool UK.
Fiona J RoweDepartment of Health Services Research University of Liverpool Liverpool UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9210-9131
University of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Department of Health CDF-2012-05-126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo provide a systematic overview of interventions for stroke related visual impairments.

methodA systematic review of the literature was conducted including randomized controlled trials, controlled trials, cohort studies, observational studies, systematic reviews, and retrospective medical note reviews. All languages were included and translation obtained. This review covers adult participants (aged 18 years or over) diagnosed with a visual impairment as a direct cause of a stroke. Studies which included mixed populations were included if over 50% of the participants had a diagnosis of stroke and were discussed separately. We searched scholarly online resources and hand searched articles and registers of published, unpublished, and ongoing trials. Search terms included a variety of MESH terms and alternatives in relation to stroke and visual conditions. Article selection was performed by two authors independently. Data were extracted by one author and verified by a second. The quality of the evidence and risk of bias was assessed using appropriate tools dependant on the type of article.

resultsForty-nine articles (4142 subjects) were included in the review, including an overview of four Cochrane systematic reviews. Interventions appraised included those for visual field loss, ocular motility deficits, reduced central vision, and visual perceptual deficits.

conclusionFurther high quality randomized controlled trials are required to determine the effectiveness of interventions for treating post-stroke visual impairments. For interventions which are used in practice but do not yet have an evidence base in the literature, it is imperative that these treatments be addressed and evaluated in future studies.

Indexed as

AdultHumansStrokeStroke RehabilitationVision Disordersinterventionmanagementreviewstroketreatmentvisual impairment

Identifiers

PMID28523224
PMCPMC5434187
OpenAlexW2604538468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.