Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28523080›Full record

ArticleThe open orthopaedics journal2016

Complications in Treatment of 31-A Fractures with Trochanteric Gamma Nail (TGN)

R Schupfner, L T Käsmann, W Wagner, A P Schulz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The open orthopaedics journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Development of early complications after treatment of trochanteric fractures with an intramedullary sliding hip screw in a geriatric population.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

R SchupfnerDepartment of Traumatology, Orthopaedics & Reconstructive Surgery, Clinic Bayreuth, Germany.
L T KäsmannDepartment of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, University of Lübeck, Germany.
W WagnerDepartment of Traumatology, Orthopaedics & Reconstructive Surgery, Clinic Bayreuth, Germany.
A P SchulzDepartment of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, University of Lübeck, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aim of this study was to clinically evaluate two generations of intramedullary gamma-nail used in the treatment of 31-A femur fractures. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn two consecutive series, 117 trochanteric gamma nails (TGN) and 100 Gamma3 nails (G3N) were implanted for the treatment of inter- and subtrochanteric fractures between 2009 and 2011. Clinical and radiological follow-up examinations were assessed. An analysis of surgical time, hemoglobin drop and complications were performed.

resultsAverage surgical time, fluoroscopy time, haemoglobin drop and length-of-stay (LOS) were similar in both groups. No significant differences were found in surgery-related complications like wound hematomas (

conclusionOur findings suggest that both TGN and G3N allow adequate treatment of trochanteric fractures with an acceptable complication rate.

Indexed as

31-A fractureComplicationsElderly gamma3 nailIntertrochanteric fractureTrochanteric gamma nail

Identifiers

PMID28523080
PMCPMC5436381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.