ReviewMediators of inflammation2017
Novel Biomarkers and the Future Potential of Biomarkers in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
Review in Mediators of inflammation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic accuracy of anti-integrin αvβ6 in ulcerative colitis: a diagnostic meta-analysis.Journal of gastroenterology · 2026Pooled it
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Comprehensive Analysis of Molecular Bases, Predictive Biomarkers, Diagnostic Methods, and Therapeutic Options.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Location is important: differentiation between ileal and colonic Crohn's disease.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2021Review
- Usefulness of Testing for Fecal Calprotectin in Pediatric Gastroenterology Clinical Practice.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2021Review
- Analysis of Human Faecal Host Proteins: Responsiveness to 10-Week Dietary Intervention Modifying Dietary Protein Intake in Elderly Males.Frontiers in nutrition · 2020Article
- Clinical utility of currently available biomarkers in inflammatory enteropathies of dogs.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2018Review
- Diagnostic Markers for Nonspecific Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.Disease markers · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is increasing importance placed upon noninvasive assessment of gut inflammation. These tools are likely to be the key in differentiating intestinal inflammatory disease from functional disorders and in monitoring the response to intervention in individuals with known inflammatory conditions. Although various noninvasive markers are currently available, they have limitations and do not provide ideal utility. This review focuses on emerging markers of gut inflammation, highlighting the potential of specific markers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.