Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28522856›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Diagnosing congenital malaria in a high-transmission setting: clinical relevance and usefulness of P. falciparum HRP2-based testing.

Hamtandi Magloire Natama, Delwendé Florence Ouedraogo, Hermann Sorgho, Eduard Rovira-Vallbona, Elisa Serra-Casas, M Athanase Somé, Maminata Coulibaly-Traoré, Petra F Mens, Luc Kestens, Halidou Tinto and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Current update on malaria in pregnancy: a systematic review.Tropical diseases, travel medicine and vaccines · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Altered Offspring Immunity in Maternal Parasitic Infections.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The immune response to malaria in utero.Immunological reviews · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Hamtandi Magloire NatamaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, B 2000, Belgium.
Delwendé Florence OuedraogoUnité de Recherche Clinique de Nanoro, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Nanoro, BP 218, Burkina Faso.
Hermann SorghoUnité de Recherche Clinique de Nanoro, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Nanoro, BP 218, Burkina Faso.
Eduard Rovira-VallbonaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, B 2000, Belgium.
Elisa Serra-CasasDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, B 2000, Belgium.
M Athanase SoméUnité de Recherche Clinique de Nanoro, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Nanoro, BP 218, Burkina Faso.
Maminata Coulibaly-TraoréUnité de Recherche Clinique de Nanoro, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Nanoro, BP 218, Burkina Faso.
Petra F MensDepartment of Medical Microbiology - Parasitology Unit, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands.
Luc KestensDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, B 2000, Belgium.
Halidou TintoUnité de Recherche Clinique de Nanoro, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Nanoro, BP 218, Burkina Faso.
Anna Rosanas-UrgellDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, B 2000, Belgium. arosanas@itg.be.
Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé · BFInstituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde · BEUniversity of Antwerp · BEAcademic Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Congenital malaria diagnosis is challenging due to frequently observed low parasite density infections, while their clinical relevance during early infancy is not well characterized. In Nanoro health district (Burkina Faso), we determined the prevalence of congenital malaria by real-time quantitative PCR and we assessed the performance of rapid diagnosis test (RDT) and light microscopy (LM) to detect Plasmodium falciparum infections in cord-blood samples. In addition, we examined the usefulness of P. falciparum Histidine Rich Protein2 (PfHRP2) as surrogate biomarker of infection and explored association between congenital malaria and clinical outcomes. A prevalence of congenital malaria by qPCR of 4% (16/400) was found, which increased to 10% among newborns from mothers infected at delivery. RDT and LM showed poor performances indicating limited utility for congenital malaria screening in cord blood. Because PfHRP2 detection in cord blood could be affected by transplacental passage of parasite antigens, PfHRP2 might not be used as a surrogate biomarker of congenital malaria infections. There was no evidence of a significant clinical impact of congenital malaria on infant's health from birth to 59 days of life. Case control studies including long-term follow up may provide additional understanding on the relevance of neonatal malaria infections.

Indexed as

Infectious Disease Transmission, VerticalAdultAntigens, ProtozoanFemaleFetal BloodHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalariaMaleMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPlasmodium falciparumProtozoan ProteinsAntigens, ProtozoanHRP-2 antigen, Plasmodium falciparumProtozoan Proteins

Identifiers

PMID28522856
PMCPMC5437093
OpenAlexW2613669623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.