ArticleScientific reports2017
Cut-off optimization for
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- New fecal test for non-invasiveWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2018Trial
- The Potential Role of the Rapid Urease Test with the Sweeping Method in the Gray Zone of the Urea Breath Test afterGut and liver · 2025Article
- Article
- Antigenic Determinant ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Sensitivity and Specificity ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Helicobacter pylori Infection, Its Laboratory Diagnosis, and Antimicrobial Resistance: a Perspective of Clinical Relevance.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2022Review
- What Is New inJournal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Induced volatolomics of pathologies.Nature reviews. Chemistry · 2021Review
- High-throughput malaria serosurveillance using a one-step multiplex bead assay.Malaria journal · 2019Article
- Optimization ofJournal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The performance of diagnostic tests in intervention trials of Helicobacter pylori (H.pylori) eradication is crucial, since even minor inaccuracies can have major impact. To determine the cut-off point for
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.