Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28522665›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2017

Nonmicrocephalic Infants with Congenital Zika Syndrome Suspected Only after Neuroimaging Evaluation Compared with Those with Microcephaly at Birth and Postnatally: How Large Is the Zika Virus "Iceberg"?

M F V V Aragao, A C Holanda, A M Brainer-Lima, N C L Petribu, M Castillo, V van der Linden, S C Serpa, A G Tenório, P T C Travassos, M T Cordeiro and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
19.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. WouldViruses · 2022
    Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.

M F V V AragaoFrom the Centro Diagnostico Multimagem (M.F.V.V.A.), Recife, Brazil fatima.vascoaragao@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2341-1422
A C HolandaFederal University of Pernambuco (A.C.H.), Recife, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4127-2366
A M Brainer-LimaPronto-Socorro Cardiológico de Pernambuco (Procape) (A.M.B.-L., M.M.V.), University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0096-4101
N C L PetribuBarão de Lucena Hospital (N.C.L.P.), Recife, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4418-9429
M CastilloDepartment of Radiology (M.C.), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2960-1064
V van der LindenAssociation for Assistance of Disabled Children (V.v.d.L.), Recife, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1641-9386
S C SerpaClínica de Apoio Ocupacional (S.C.S.), Jaboatão dos Guararapes, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2007-6216
A G TenórioDom Malan Hospital (A.G.T.), Petrolina, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4765-2527
P T C TravassosLaboratório Fernando Travassos (P.T.C.T.), Recife, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1014-4169
M T CordeiroCentro de Pesquisas Aggeu Magalhães (M.T.C., C.S.), Fiocruz, Recife, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8196-807X
C SarteschiCentro de Pesquisas Aggeu Magalhães (M.T.C., C.S.), Fiocruz, Recife, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8536-0598
M M ValencaPronto-Socorro Cardiológico de Pernambuco (Procape) (A.M.B.-L., M.M.V.), University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0678-3782
A CostelloDepartment of Maternal, Child, and Adolescent Health (A.C.), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0460-4245
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco · BRFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRFaculdade Frassinetti do Recife · BRFundação Dom Cabral · BRHospital and Rehabilitation for Disabled Children · NPHospital São Lucas da PUCRS · BRInstituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira · BRSociedade Brasileira de Oncologia Clínica · BRUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeAlthough microcephaly is the most prominent feature of congenital Zika syndrome, a spectrum with less severe cases is starting to be recognized. Our aim was to review neuroimaging of infants to detect cases without microcephaly and compare them with those with microcephaly. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively evaluated all neuroimaging (MR imaging/CT) of infants 1 year of age or younger. Patients with congenital Zika syndrome were divided into those with microcephaly at birth, postnatal microcephaly, and without microcephaly. Neuroimaging was compared among groups.

resultsAmong 77 infants, 24.6% had congenital Zika syndrome (11.7% microcephaly at birth, 9.1% postnatal microcephaly, 3.9% without microcephaly). The postnatal microcephaly and without microcephaly groups showed statistically similar imaging findings. The microcephaly at birth compared with the group without microcephaly showed statistically significant differences for the following: reduced brain volume, calcifications outside the cortico-subcortical junctions, corpus callosum abnormalities, moderate-to-severe ventriculomegaly, an enlarged extra-axial space, an enlarged cisterna magna (all absent in those without microcephaly), and polymicrogyria (the only malformation present without microcephaly). There was a trend toward pachygyria (absent in groups without microcephaly). The group with microcephaly at birth compared with the group with postnatal microcephaly showed significant differences for simplified gyral pattern, calcifications outside the cortico-subcortical junctions, corpus callosum abnormalities, moderate-to-severe ventriculomegaly, and an enlarged extra-axial space.

conclusionsIn microcephaly at birth, except for polymicrogyria, all patients showed abnormalities described in the literature. In postnatal microcephaly, the only abnormalities not seen were a simplified gyral pattern and calcifications outside the cortico-subcortical junction. Infants with normocephaly presented with asymmetric frontal polymicrogyria, calcifications in the cortico-subcortical junction, mild ventriculomegaly, and delayed myelination.

Indexed as

BrainFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMalformations of Cortical DevelopmentMicrocephalyNeuroimagingPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousRetrospective StudiesSyndromeTomography, X-Ray ComputedZika Virus Infection

Identifiers

PMID28522665
PMCPMC7959892
OpenAlexW2616557390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.