Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28521823›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2017

T1rho and T2 relaxation times of the normal adult knee meniscus at 3T: analysis of zonal differences.

Shoichiro Takao, Tan B Nguyen, Hon J Yu, Shigeo Hagiwara, Yasuhito Kaneko, Taiki Nozaki, Seiji Iwamoto, Maki Otomo, Ran Schwarzkopf, Hiroshi Yoshioka

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. TSkeletal radiology · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Synovial mesenchymal stem cells promote the meniscus repair in a novel pig meniscus injury model.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2021
    Article
  10. Observational
  11. Biexponential TJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Shoichiro TakaoDepartment of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, 101 The City Drive South, Rt. 140, Orange, CA, 92868, USA.
Tan B NguyenDepartment of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, 101 The City Drive South, Rt. 140, Orange, CA, 92868, USA.
Hon J YuDepartment of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, 101 The City Drive South, Rt. 140, Orange, CA, 92868, USA.
Shigeo HagiwaraDepartment of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, 101 The City Drive South, Rt. 140, Orange, CA, 92868, USA.
Yasuhito KanekoDepartment of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, 101 The City Drive South, Rt. 140, Orange, CA, 92868, USA.
Taiki NozakiDepartment of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, 101 The City Drive South, Rt. 140, Orange, CA, 92868, USA.
Seiji IwamotoDepartment of Radiology, Tokushima University Hospital, 3-18-15, Kuramoto-Cho, Tokushima City, 770-8509, Tokushima, Japan.
Maki OtomoDepartment of Radiology, Tokushima University Hospital, 3-18-15, Kuramoto-Cho, Tokushima City, 770-8509, Tokushima, Japan.
Ran SchwarzkopfDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Irvine, 101 The City Drive South, Orange, 92868, CA, USA.
Hiroshi YoshiokaDepartment of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, 101 The City Drive South, Rt. 140, Orange, CA, 92868, USA. hiroshi@uci.edu.
University of California, Irvine · USTokushima University Hospital · JPUniversity of California, Irvine Medical Center · US

Funding

University of California Health Participation in the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C)UL1TR001414 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI COOPER, DAN M, VILAIN, ERIC J. · 2015 to 2023
$35.1M
Institute for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR000153 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI COOPER, DAN M · 2012 to 2015
$12.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000153NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001414
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrior studies describe histological and immunohistochemical differences in collagen and proteoglycan content in different meniscal zones. The aim of this study is to evaluate horizontal and vertical zonal differentiation of T1rho and T2 relaxation times of the entire meniscus from volunteers without symptom and imaging abnormality.

methodsTwenty volunteers age between 19 and 38 who have no knee-related clinical symptoms, and no history of prior knee surgeries were enrolled in this study. Two T1rho mapping (b-FFE T1rho and SPGR T1rho) and T2 mapping images were acquired with a 3.0-T MR scanner. Each meniscus was divided manually into superficial and deep zones for horizontal zonal analysis. The anterior and posterior horns of each meniscus were divided manually into white, red-white and red zones for vertical zonal analysis. Zonal differences of average relaxation times among each zone, and both inter- and intra-observer reproducibility were statistically analyzed.

resultsIn horizontal zonal analysis, T1rho relaxation times of the superficial zone tended to be higher than those of the deep zone, and this difference was statistically significant in the medial meniscal segments (84.3 ms vs 76.0 ms on b-FFE, p < 0.0001 and 96.5 ms vs 91.7 ms on SPGR, p = 0.004). In vertical zonal analysis, T1rho relaxation times of the white zone tended to be higher than those of the red zone, and this difference was statistically significant in the posterior horn of the medical meniscus (88.4 ms vs 77.1 ms on b-FFE, p < 0.001 and 104.9 ms vs 96.8 ms on SPGR, p =0.001). Likewise, T2 relaxation times of the superficial zone were significantly higher than those of the deep zone (80.4 ms vs 74.4 ms in the medial meniscus, p = 0.011). T2 relaxation times of the white zone were significantly higher than those of the red zone in the medial meniscus posterior horn (96.8 ms vs 84.3 ms, p < 0.001) and lateral meniscus anterior horn (104.6 ms vs 84.2 ms, p < 0.0001). Inter-class and intra-class correlation coefficients were excellent (>0.74) or good (0.60-0.74) in all meniscal segments on both horizontal and vertical zonal analysis, except for inter-class correlation coefficients of the lateral meniscus on SPGR. Compared with SPGR T1rho images, b-FFE T1rho images demonstrated more significant zonal differentiation with higher inter- and intra-observer reproducibility.

conclusionsThere are zonal differences in T1rho and T2 relaxation times of the normal meniscus.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansKnee JointMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMenisci, TibialTime FactorsKneeMagnetic resonance imagingMeniscusT1rhoT2 mappingZonal differentiation

Identifiers

PMID28521823
PMCPMC5437607
OpenAlexW2616682389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.