Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28521784›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2017

Functional regression method for whole genome eQTL epistasis analysis with sequencing data.

Kelin Xu, Li Jin, Momiao Xiong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kelin XuState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering and Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Contemporary Anthropology, Collaborative Innovation Center for Genetics and Development, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200438, China.
Li JinState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering and Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Contemporary Anthropology, Collaborative Innovation Center for Genetics and Development, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200438, China.
Momiao XiongState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering and Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Contemporary Anthropology, Collaborative Innovation Center for Genetics and Development, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200438, China. momiao.xiong@uth.tmc.edu.

Funding

Statistical Methods for Finding Missing HeritabilityR01HL106034 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI XIONG, MOMIAO · 2011 to 2014
$1.5M
Network Approach to GWA Studies of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Ankylosing SpondyliR01AR057120 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI XIONG, MOMIAO · 2009 to 2010
$554k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL106034NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR057120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpistasis plays an essential rule in understanding the regulation mechanisms and is an essential component of the genetic architecture of the gene expressions. However, interaction analysis of gene expressions remains fundamentally unexplored due to great computational challenges and data availability. Due to variation in splicing, transcription start sites, polyadenylation sites, post-transcriptional RNA editing across the entire gene, and transcription rates of the cells, RNA-seq measurements generate large expression variability and collectively create the observed position level read count curves. A single number for measuring gene expression which is widely used for microarray measured gene expression analysis is highly unlikely to sufficiently account for large expression variation across the gene. Simultaneously analyzing epistatic architecture using the RNA-seq and whole genome sequencing (WGS) data poses enormous challenges.

methodsWe develop a nonlinear functional regression model (FRGM) with functional responses where the position-level read counts within a gene are taken as a function of genomic position, and functional predictors where genotype profiles are viewed as a function of genomic position, for epistasis analysis with RNA-seq data. Instead of testing the interaction of all possible pair-wises SNPs, the FRGM takes a gene as a basic unit for epistasis analysis, which tests for the interaction of all possible pairs of genes and use all the information that can be accessed to collectively test interaction between all possible pairs of SNPs within two genome regions.

resultsBy large-scale simulations, we demonstrate that the proposed FRGM for epistasis analysis can achieve the correct type 1 error and has higher power to detect the interactions between genes than the existing methods. The proposed methods are applied to the RNA-seq and WGS data from the 1000 Genome Project. The numbers of pairs of significantly interacting genes after Bonferroni correction identified using FRGM, RPKM and DESeq were 16,2361, 260 and 51, respectively, from the 350 European samples.

conclusionsThe proposed FRGM for epistasis analysis of RNA-seq can capture isoform and position-level information and will have a broad application. Both simulations and real data analysis highlight the potential for the FRGM to be a good choice of the epistatic analysis with sequencing data.

Indexed as

Whole Genome SequencingEpistasis, GeneticGene OntologyGene Regulatory NetworksGenomicsMAP Kinase Signaling SystemNonlinear DynamicsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait LociRegression AnalysisAssociation studieseQTLFunctional regression modelsGene-gene interactionMultivariate functional regressionNext-generation sequencingRNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID28521784
PMCPMC5436462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.