Trial reportBMC neurology2017
Clinical experience with transcutaneous supraorbital nerve stimulation in patients with refractory migraine or with migraine and intolerance to topiramate: a prospective exploratory clinical study.
Trial report in BMC neurology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical Experience With Transcutaneous Supraorbital Nerve Stimulation in Patients With Refractory Migraine or With Migraine and Intolerance to Topiramate: a Prospective Exploratory Clinical Study
Transcutaneous Supraorbital Nerve Stimulator Versus Topiramate in Prevention of Recurrent Migraine: A Prospective, Randomized Comparative Study.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical and cognitive effects of external trigeminal nerve stimulation (eTNS) in neurological and psychiatric disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Molecular psychiatry · 2023Pooled it
- Extracranial Trigger Site Surgery for Migraine: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis on Elimination of Headache Symptoms.Frontiers in neurology · 2019Pooled it
- Effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the treatment of migraine: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.The journal of headache and pain · 2018Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of transcutaneous supraorbital nerve stimulation versus topiramate for migraine prevention: a non-inferiority randomized trial.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Trial
- Phase 3 randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled Trial of e-TNS for the Acute treatment of Migraine (TEAM).Scientific reports · 2022Trial
- Acute migraine therapy with external trigeminal neurostimulation (ACME): A randomized controlled trial.Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache · 2019Trial
- Non-Invasive Neuromodulation in the Treatment of Headache.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025Review
- Neuromodulation in Chronic Migraine: Evidence and Recommendations from the GRADE Framework.Advances in therapy · 2025Review
- Neuromodulation Techniques for Headache Management.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Migraine: from pathophysiology to treatment.Journal of neurology · 2023Review
- Migraine and Neuromodulation: A Literature Review.Cureus · 2022Review
- Neuromodulation for Chronic Daily Headache.Current pain and headache reports · 2022Review
- Non-Invasive Neurostimulation Methods for Acute and Preventive Migraine Treatment-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Open Label Prospective Experience of Supplementation with a Fixed Combination of Magnesium, Vitamin B2, Feverfew, Andrographis Paniculata and Coenzyme Q10 for Episodic Migraine Prophylaxis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Peripheral Neuromodulation for the Management of Headache.Anesthesiology and pain medicine · 2020Review
- A new era in headache treatment.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMigraine is included in the top-ten disabling diseases and conditions among the Western populations. Non-invasive neurostimulation, including the Cefaly® device, for the treatment of various types of pain is a relatively new field of interest. The aim of the present study was to explore the clinical experience with Cefaly® in a cohort of migraine patients previously refractory or intolerant to topiramate prophylaxis.
methodsA prospective, multi-center clinical study was performed in patients diagnosed with episodic or chronic migraine with a previous failure to topiramate treatment requiring prevention with Cefaly® according to the treating physician's suggestion. A 1-month period of baseline observation was followed by a 3-month period of observation during the use of transcutaneous supraorbital nerve stimulation (t-SNS) with Cefaly® as the only preventive treatment.
resultsA small but statistically significant decline was shown over time in the number of days with headache (HA), the number of days with HA with intensity ≥5/10, and the number of days with use of acute medication after 3 months (p < 0.001 for all of the three changes). Twenty-three patients (65.7%) expressed their satisfaction and intent to continue treatment with Cefaly®. Compliance was higher among satisfied subjects compared to non-satisfied subjects. None of the explored factors were significantly associated with the reason for the failure of topiramate.
conclusionThree-months of preventive treatment for episodic or chronic migraine with t-SNS proved to be an effective, safe and well tolerated option for the treatment of patients with migraine who were intolerant or did not respond to topiramate.
trial registrationClinicalTrials NCT03125525 . Registered 21 April 2017.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.