Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28521756›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2017

Rethinking physical activity communication: using focus groups to understand women's goals, values, and beliefs to improve public health.

Michelle Segar, Jennifer M Taber, Heather Patrick, Chan L Thai, April Oh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Promoting an active choice among physically inactive adults: a randomised web-based four-arm experiment.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2022
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Supporting Sustainable Health Behavior Change: The Whole is Greater Than the Sum of Its Parts.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Get the message? A scoping review of physical activity messaging.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michelle SegarSport, Health, and Activity Research and Policy (SHARP) Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. fitness@umich.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7180-9558
Jennifer M TaberBehavioral Research Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA.
Heather PatrickBehavioral Science, Carrot Sense, Inc., 1600 Seaport Blvd, Suite 150, Redwood City, CA, 94063, USA.
Chan L ThaiDepartment of Communication, Santa Clara University, 500 El Camino Real, Santa Clara, CA, 95053, USA.
April OhHealth Communication and Informatics Research Branch, Behavioral Research Program, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, 20850, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunication about physical activity (PA) frames PA and influences what it means to people, including the role it plays in their lives. To the extent that PA messages can be designed to reflect outcomes that are relevant to what people most value experiencing and achieving in their daily lives, the more compelling and effective they will be. Aligned with self-determination theory, this study investigated proximal goals and values that are salient in everyday life and how they could be leveraged through new messaging to better support PA participation among women. The present study was designed to examine the nature of women's daily goals and priorities and investigate women's PA beliefs, feelings, and experiences, in order to identify how PA may compete with or facilitate women's daily goals and priorities. Preliminary recommendations are proposed for designing new PA messages that align PA with women's daily goals and desired experiences to better motivate participation.

methodsEight focus groups were conducted with White, Black, and Hispanic/Latina women aged 22-49, stratified by amount of self-reported PA (29 low active participants, 11 high active participants). Respondents discussed their goals, values, and daily priorities along with beliefs, feelings about and experiences being physically active. Data were collected, coded, and analyzed using a thematic analysis strategy to identify emergent themes.

resultsMany of the goals and values that both low and high active participants discussed as desiring and valuing map on to key principles of self-determination theory. However, the discussions among low active participants suggested that their beliefs, feelings, experiences, and definitions of PA were in conflict with their proximal goals, values, and priorities, also undermining their psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness.

conclusionsFindings from this study can be used to inform and evaluate new physical activity communication strategies that leverage more proximal goals, values, and experiences of happiness and success to better motivate PA among ethnically diverse low active women. Specifically, this research suggests a need to address how women's daily goals and desired experiences may undermine PA participation, in addition to framing PA as facilitating rather than competing with their daily priorities and desired leisure-time experiences.

Indexed as

CommunicationGoalsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeWomen's HealthAdultBlack or African AmericanEthnicityExerciseFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMiddle AgedMotivationSelf ReportCommunicationExerciseGoalsHappinessMessagingPhysical activityPrioritiesSelf-determination theoryValuesWomen

Identifiers

PMID28521756
PMCPMC5437577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.