Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28521740›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2017

Going to scale: design and implementation challenges of a program to increase access to skilled birth attendants in Nigeria.

Edward N Okeke, Emma Pitchforth, Josephine Exley, Peter Glick, Isa Sadeeq Abubakar, Amalavoyal V Chari, Usman Bashir, Kun Gu, Obinna Onwujekwe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. La pérennité d'un projet de prévention et de prise en charge de la malnutrition au Niger.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Edward N OkekeRAND Corporation, 4570 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. eokeke@rand.org.
Emma PitchforthRAND Europe, Cambridge, UK.
Josephine ExleyRAND Europe, Cambridge, UK.
Peter GlickRAND Corporation, 4570 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Isa Sadeeq AbubakarBayero University Kano, Kano, Nigeria.
Amalavoyal V ChariUniversity of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Usman BashirBayero University Kano, Kano, Nigeria.
Kun GuRAND Corporation, 4570 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Obinna OnwujekweUniversity of Nigeria Enugu, Nsukka, Nigeria.
RAND Corporation · USBayero University Kano · NGRAND Europe · GBUniversity of Nigeria · NGUniversity of Sussex · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe lack of availability of skilled providers in low- and middle- income countries is considered to be an important barrier to achieving reductions in maternal and child mortality. However, there is limited research on programs increasing the availability of skilled birth attendants in developing countries. We study the implementation of the Nigeria Midwives Service Scheme, a government program that recruited and deployed nearly 2,500 midwives to rural primary health care facilities across Nigeria in 2010. An outcome evaluation carried out by this team found only a modest impact on the use of antenatal care and no measurable impact on skilled birth attendance. This paper draws on perspectives of policymakers, program midwives, and community residents to understand why the program failed to have the desired impact.

methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with federal, state and local government policy makers and with MSS midwives. We also conducted focus groups with community stakeholders including community leaders and male and female residents.

resultsOur data reveal a range of design, implementation and operational challenges ranging from insufficient buy-in by key stakeholders at state and local levels, to irregular and in some cases total non-provision of agreed midwife benefits that likely contributed to the program's lack of impact. These challenges not only created a deep sense of dissatisfaction with the program but also had practical impacts on service delivery likely affecting households' uptake of services.

conclusionThis paper highlights the challenge of effectively scaling up maternal and child health interventions. Our findings emphasize the critical importance of program design, particularly when programs are implemented at scale; the need to identify and involve key stakeholders during planning and implementation; the importance of clearly defining lines of authority and responsibility that align with existing structures; and the necessity for multi-faceted interventions that address multiple barriers at the same time.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityMidwiferyRural Health ServicesAllied Health PersonnelDeveloping CountriesFocus GroupsHumansMaternal Health ServicesNigeriaPatient Care TeamStakeholder ParticipationWorkforceImplementationMidwivesNigeriaSkilled birth attendance

Identifiers

PMID28521740
PMCPMC5437674
OpenAlexW2616728057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.