Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28521333›Full record

ReviewJournal of the National Cancer Institute2017

Drugging the Cancers Addicted to DNA Repair.

Jac A Nickoloff, Dennie Jones, Suk-Hee Lee, Elizabeth A Williamson, Robert Hromas

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 161 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Polymorphisms of DNA Repair Genes in Thyroid Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Cellular Responses to Widespread DNA Replication Stress.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jac A NickoloffDepartment of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Dennie JonesDepartment of Medicine and the Cancer Center, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Suk-Hee LeeDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Elizabeth A WilliamsonDepartment of Medicine and the Cancer Center, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Robert HromasDepartment of Medicine and the Cancer Center, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL, USA.
University of Florida Health · USColorado State University · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · US

Funding

EEPD1 Repair of Stressed Replication ForksR01CA205224 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI Robert A Hromas · 2016 to 2026
$3.3M
Non-Homologous End Joining Repair in HumansR01CA151367 · NCI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI LEE, SUK-HEE · 2011 to 2015
$1.6M
Mechanisms for Chromosomal TranslocationsR01GM109645 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI HROMAS, ROBERT A · 2015 to 2018
$1.2M
Investigating DNA repair vulnerabilities in oncometabolite producing cancersF31CA260794 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI NORONHA, KATELYN · 2021 to 2023
$122k
NCI NIH HHS F31 CA260794NCI NIH HHS R01 CA151367NCI NIH HHS R01 CA205224NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM109645
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Defects in DNA repair can result in oncogenic genomic instability. Cancers occurring from DNA repair defects were once thought to be limited to rare inherited mutations (such as BRCA1 or 2). It now appears that a clinically significant fraction of cancers have acquired DNA repair defects. DNA repair pathways operate in related networks, and cancers arising from loss of one DNA repair component typically become addicted to other repair pathways to survive and proliferate. Drug inhibition of the rescue repair pathway prevents the repair-deficient cancer cell from replicating, causing apoptosis (termed synthetic lethality). However, the selective pressure of inhibiting the rescue repair pathway can generate further mutations that confer resistance to the synthetic lethal drugs. Many such drugs currently in clinical use inhibit PARP1, a repair component to which cancers arising from inherited BRCA1 or 2 mutations become addicted. It is now clear that drugs inducing synthetic lethality may also be therapeutic in cancers with acquired DNA repair defects, which would markedly broaden their applicability beyond treatment of cancers with inherited DNA repair defects. Here we review how each DNA repair pathway can be attacked therapeutically and evaluate DNA repair components as potential drug targets to induce synthetic lethality. Clinical use of drugs targeting DNA repair will markedly increase when functional and genetic loss of repair components are consistently identified. In addition, future therapies will exploit artificial synthetic lethality, where complementary DNA repair pathways are targeted simultaneously in cancers without DNA repair defects.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsDNA End-Joining RepairDNA Mismatch RepairDNA RepairGenes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2Homologous RecombinationHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasmsPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsSynthetic Lethal MutationsAntineoplastic AgentsPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID28521333
PMCPMC5436301
OpenAlexW2614456022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.