Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28521080›Full record

ArticlePediatric blood & cancer2017

Histology, fusion status, and outcome in metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma: A report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Erin R Rudzinski, James R Anderson, Yueh-Yun Chi, Julie M Gastier-Foster, Caroline Astbury, Frederic G Barr, Stephen X Skapek, Douglas S Hawkins, Brenda J Weigel, Alberto Pappo and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. CAR-T cell immunotherapy in rhabdomyosarcoma.Journal of translational medicine · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Erin R RudzinskiDepartment of Laboratories, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7591-956X
James R AndersonOncology Clinical Research, Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, PA.
Yueh-Yun ChiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Julie M Gastier-FosterDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.
Caroline AstburyDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.
Frederic G BarrLaboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Stephen X SkapekDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Douglas S HawkinsDepartment of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington.
Brenda J WeigelDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Alberto PappoDepartment of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
William H MeyerDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
Michael A ArnoldDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.
Lisa A TeotDepartment of Pathology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
David M ParhamDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles and Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Nationwide Children's Hospital · USSeattle Children's Hospital · USBoston Children's Hospital · USMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USNational Cancer Institute · USSouthwestern Medical Center · USSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

NCTN BIQSFP ANBL1531 (NRT)U10CA180886 · NCI · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI Douglas S. Hawkins · 2014 to 2026
$390.6M
COG FOREIGN ACCRUALU10CA098543 · NCI · NATIONAL CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION · PI ADAMSON, PETER C. · 2003 to 2013
$335.5M
COG SDMC - Statistics CoreU10CA180899 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI TODD A ALONZO · 2014 to 2026
$132.8M
Children's Oncology Group Statistics &Data Center GrantU10CA098413 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI ANDERSON, JAMES R · 2003 to 2013
$67.5M
Studies of gene fusions in rhabdomyosarcomaZIABC011387 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI BARR, FREDERIC · 2011 to 2025
$9.1M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA098413NCI NIH HHS U10 CA098543NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180886NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180899
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDistinguishing alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (ARMS) from embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (ERMS) has historically been of prognostic and therapeutic importance. However, classification has been complicated by shifting histologic criteria required for an ARMS diagnosis. Children's Oncology Group (COG) studies after IRS-IV, which included the height of this diagnostic shift, showed both an increased number of ARMS and an increase in the proportion of fusion-negative ARMS. Following diagnostic standardization and histologic re-review of ARMS cases enrolled during this era, analysis of low-risk (D9602) and intermediate-risk (D9803) rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) studies showed that fusion status rather than histology best predicts prognosis for patients with RMS. This analysis remains to be completed for patients with high-risk RMS. PROCEDURE: We re-reviewed cases on high-risk COG studies D9802 and ARST0431 with an enrollment diagnosis of ARMS. We compared the event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival by histology, PAX-FOXO1 fusion, and clinical risk factors (Oberlin score) for patients with metastatic RMS using the log-rank test.

resultsHistology re-review resulted in reclassification as ERMS for 12% of D9802 cases and 5% of ARST0431 cases. Fusion-negative RMS had a superior EFS to fusion-positive RMS; however, poorer outcome for metastatic RMS was most related to clinical risk factors including age, primary site, and number of metastatic sites.

conclusionsIn contrast to low- or intermediate-risk RMS, in metastatic RMS, clinical risk factors have the most impact on patient outcome. PAX-FOXO1 fusion is more common in patients with a high Oberlin score, but fusion status is not an independent biomarker of prognosis.

Indexed as

Gene FusionAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolDisease-Free SurvivalHumansInfantNeoplasm MetastasisRhabdomyosarcoma, AlveolarRisk FactorsYoung AdultARST0431D9802fusion statushigh riskhistologyrhabdomyosarcoma

Identifiers

PMID28521080
PMCPMC5647228
OpenAlexW2615723987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.