Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28520762›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Indexical and linguistic processing by 12-month-olds: Discrimination of speaker, accent and vowel differences.

Karen E Mulak, Cory D Bonn, Kateřina Chládková, Richard N Aslin, Paola Escudero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Developmental change in English-learning children's interpretations of salient pitch contours in word learning.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karen E MulakThe MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0387-2109
Cory D BonnDepartment of Brain & Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States of America.
Kateřina ChládkováAmsterdam Center for Language and Communication, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Richard N AslinDepartment of Brain & Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States of America.
Paola EscuderoThe MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infants preferentially discriminate between speech tokens that cross native category boundaries prior to acquiring a large receptive vocabulary, implying a major role for unsupervised distributional learning strategies in phoneme acquisition in the first year of life. Multiple sources of between-speaker variability contribute to children's language input and thus complicate the problem of distributional learning. Adults resolve this type of indexical variability by adjusting their speech processing for individual speakers. For infants to handle indexical variation in the same way, they must be sensitive to both linguistic and indexical cues. To assess infants' sensitivity to and relative weighting of indexical and linguistic cues, we familiarized 12-month-old infants to tokens of a vowel produced by one speaker, and tested their listening preference to trials containing a vowel category change produced by the same speaker (linguistic information), and the same vowel category produced by another speaker of the same or a different accent (indexical information). Infants noticed linguistic and indexical differences, suggesting that both are salient in infant speech processing. Future research should explore how infants weight these cues in a distributional learning context that contains both phonetic and indexical variation.

Indexed as

LanguageLearningPhoneticsAcoustic StimulationFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleSpeech Perception

Identifiers

PMID28520762
PMCPMC5435166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.