Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28520562›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology2016

Reliability and repeatability of pulp volume reconstruction through three different volume calculations.

T Y Marroquin Penaloza, S Karkhanis, S I Kvaal, S Vasudavan, E Castelblanco, E Kruger, M Tennant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. CT and MR imaging used in age estimation: a systematic review.The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

T Y Marroquin PenalozaSchool of Anatomy, Physiology and Human Biology University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.
S KarkhanisSchool of Anatomy, Physiology and Human Biology University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.
S I KvaalFaculty of Dentistry, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Oslo, Norway.
S VasudavanSchool of Anatomy, Physiology and Human Biology University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.
E CastelblancoSchool of Anatomy, Physiology and Human Biology University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.
E KrugerSchool of Anatomy, Physiology and Human Biology University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.
M TennantSchool of Anatomy, Physiology and Human Biology University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo test the variability of the volume measurements when different segmentation methods are applied in pulp volume reconstruction. MATERIALS AND

methodsOsirix® and ITK-SNAP software were used. Different segmentation methods (Part A) and volume approaches (Part B) were tested in a sample of 21 dental CBCT's from upper canines. Different combinations of the data set were also tested on one lower molar and one upper canine (Part C) to determine the variability of the results when automatic segmentation is performed.

resultsAlthough the obtained results show correlation among them(r > 0.75), there is no evidence that these methods are sensitive enough to detect small volume changes in structures such as the dental pulp canal (Part A and Part B). Automatic segmentation is highly susceptible to be affected by small variations in the setting parameters (Part C).

conclusionsAlthough the volumetric reconstruction and pulp/tooth volume ratio has not shown better results than methods based on dental radiographs, it is worth to persevere with the research in this area with new development in imaging techniques.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyAdolescentAdultAge Determination by TeethCuspidDental PulpFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSoftwareYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28520562
PMCPMC6035760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.