Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28520521›Full record

ReviewSLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D2017

Three-Dimensional Cell Cultures in Drug Discovery and Development.

Ye Fang, Richard M Eglen

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 410 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
410citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

410 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Astrocyte Enrichment of 3D Cortical Constructs Enhances Brain Repair.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Cancer metastasisFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Review

350 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ye Fang1 Biochemical Technologies, Corning Research and Development Corporation, Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY, USA.
Richard M Eglen2 Corning Life Sciences, Corning Incorporated, Tewksbury, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The past decades have witnessed significant efforts toward the development of three-dimensional (3D) cell cultures as systems that better mimic in vivo physiology. Today, 3D cell cultures are emerging, not only as a new tool in early drug discovery but also as potential therapeutics to treat disease. In this review, we assess leading 3D cell culture technologies and their impact on drug discovery, including spheroids, organoids, scaffolds, hydrogels, organs-on-chips, and 3D bioprinting. We also discuss the implementation of these technologies in compound identification, screening, and development, ranging from disease modeling to assessment of efficacy and safety profiles.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Culture TechniquesDrug DiscoveryDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorHumans3D bioprinting3D cell culturedisease modelsefficacymulticellular spheroidorganoidsorgans-on-chipssafetyscreeningtoxicity

Identifiers

PMID28520521
PMCPMC5448717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.