Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28518133›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2017

An evaluation of hydrocortisone dosing for neonatal refractory hypotension.

E S Peeples

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Blood pressure values and hypotension management in extremely preterm infants: a multi-center study.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

E S PeeplesDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
University of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of the study was to compare blood pressure, vasoactive medication requirements and adverse outcomes after administration of high- versus low-dose hydrocortisone (HC) in preterm infants. STUDY

designThis is a retrospective analysis of 106 infants ⩽28 weeks gestational age with hypotension requiring vasoactive infusions and high-dose (4 mg kg

resultsThere were no differences in measured efficacy between the low- and high-dose groups. Infants with pre-treatment cortisol >15 mcg dl

conclusionThese results support using the lowest effective HC dose in preterm infants. In addition, HC therapy should likely be avoided in infants who are not cortisol deficient.

Indexed as

HypotensionInfant, Premature, DiseasesVasoconstrictor AgentsBlood PressureDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug ResistanceFemaleGlucocorticoidsHumansHydrocortisoneHyperglycemiaInfantInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMaleGlucocorticoidsHydrocortisoneVasoconstrictor Agents

Identifiers

PMID28518133
OpenAlexW2615332020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.