ArticleIET systems biology2017
Analysis of healthy and tumour DNA methylation distributions in kidney-renal-clear-cell-carcinoma using Kullback-Leibler and Jensen-Shannon distance measures.
Article in IET systems biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Cortical Asymmetry Index for subtyping dementia patients.European radiology · 2025Article
- KD_MultiSucc: incorporating multi-teacher knowledge distillation and word embeddings for cross-species prediction of protein succinylation sites.Biology methods & protocols · 2025Article
- Longitudinal assessment of demographic representativeness in the Medical Imaging and Data Resource Center open data commons.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2023Article
- Quantifying information of intracellular signaling: progress with machine learning.Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society (Great Britain) · 2022Review
- Concepts and Applications of Information Theory to Immuno-Oncology.Trends in cancer · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA methylation is an epigenetic phenomenon in which methyl groups get bonded to the cytosines of the DNA molecule altering the expression of the associated genes. Cancer is linked with hypo or hyper-methylation of specific genes as well as global changes in DNA methylation. In this study, the authors study the probability density function distribution of DNA methylation in various significant genes and across the genome in healthy and tumour samples. They propose a unique 'average healthy methylation distribution' based on the methylation values of several healthy samples. They then obtain the Kullback-Leibler and Jensen-Shannon distances between methylation distributions of the healthy and tumour samples and the average healthy methylation distribution. The distance measures of the healthy and tumour samples from the average healthy methylation distribution are compared and the differences in the distances are analysed as possible parameters for cancer. A classifier trained on these values was found to provide high values of sensitivity and specificity. They consider this to be a computationally efficient approach to predict tumour samples based on DNA methylation data. This technique can also be improvised to consider other differentially methylated genes significant in cancer or other epigenetic diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.