ArticleEmerging infectious diseases2017
Brucella neotomae Infection in Humans, Costa Rica.
Article in Emerging infectious diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning based on pangenome-wide association studies reveals the impact of host source on the zoonotic potential of closely related bacterial pathogens.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Investigation of genomic island 2 deciphers the evolution of a genus Brucella.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Molecular and serological survey of Brucella spp. among rodents in western Iran.BMC veterinary research · 2025Article
- Brucella microti and Rodent-Borne Brucellosis: A Neglected Public Health Threat.Zoonoses and public health · 2025Review
- Brucellosis: Unveiling the complexities of a pervasive zoonotic disease and its global impacts.Open veterinary journal · 2024Review
- Brucellosis Seropositivity Using Three Serological Tests and Associated Risk Factors in Abattoir Workers in Gauteng Province, South Africa.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Genomic Diversity and Zoonotic Potential of Brucella neotomae.Emerging infectious diseases · 2024Article
- VirulentmSphere · 2023Article
- Serological and Molecular Detection of Human Brucellosis in Rural Areas in Wasit Province, Iraq.Archives of Razi Institute · 2023Article
- Assays for Identification and Differentiation ofMicroorganisms · 2022Review
- The Retrospective on AtypicalMicroorganisms · 2022Review
- Activation of mucosal immunity as a novel therapeutic strategy for combating brucellosis.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
- Uncovering the Hidden Credentials ofMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2021Review
- Scenario of pathogenesis and socioeconomic burden of human brucellosis in Saudi Arabia.Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2021Review
- The PhospholipidFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Convergent evolution of zoonoticProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Review
- Longitudinal Study of Bacterial Infectious Agents in a Community of Small Mammals in New Mexico.Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.) · 2020Article
- Persistence of Brucella abortus lineages revealed by genomic characterization and phylodynamic analysis.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Several species of Brucella are known to be zoonotic, but B. neotomae infection has been thought to be limited to wood rats. In 2008 and 2011, however, B. neotomae was isolated from cerebrospinal fluid of 2 men with neurobrucellosis. The nonzoonotic status of B. neotomae should be reassessed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.