Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28516471›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2017

Topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for analgesia in traumatic corneal abrasions.

Abel Wakai, John G Lawrenson, Annali L Lawrenson, Yongjun Wang, Michael D Brown, Michael Quirke, Omar Ghandour, Ryan McCormick, Cathal D Walsh, Ahmed Amayem and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antibiotic prophylaxis for corneal abrasion.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Topical ophthalmic anesthetics for corneal abrasions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Antibiotic prophylaxis for corneal abrasion.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Corneal foreign bodies.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2022
    Article
  10. Modulating Ocular Surface Pain Through Neurokinin-1 Receptor Blockade.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for corneal abrasions in children.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Abel WakaiEmergency Care Research Unit (ECRU), Division of Population Health Sciences (PHS), Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), 123 St. Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Ireland.
John G LawrensonApplied Vision Research Centre, School of Health Sciences, City University of London, Northampton Square, London, UK, EC1V 0HB.
Annali L LawrensonEmergency Department, Epsom General Hospital, Dorking Road, Epsom, Surrey, UK, KT18 7EG.
Yongjun WangSchulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, Kresge Building, Rm. K1, London, ON, Canada.
Michael D BrownDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, 100 Michigan NE, Grand Rapids, MI, USA, 49503.
Michael QuirkeEmergency Care Research Unit (ECRU), Division of Population Health Sciences (PHS), Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), 123 St. Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Omar GhandourSchool of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), 123 St. Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Ryan McCormickSchool of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), 123 St. Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Cathal D WalshHealth Research Institute (HRI) and MACSI, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Limerick, Ireland.
Ahmed AmayemCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Eddy LangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Calgary, 2015 42 Ave SW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2T 2M8.
Nick HarrisonBeaumont Health Emergency Medicine Residency, Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA, 48067.
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IEUniversity of Calgary · CABeaumont Hospital, Royal Oak · USCity, University of London · GBEpsom Hospital · GBMichigan State University · USUniversity of Limerick · IEWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraumatic corneal abrasions are relatively common and there is a lack of consensus about analgesia in their management. It is therefore important to document the clinical efficacy and safety profile of topical ophthalmic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the management of traumatic corneal abrasions.

objectivesTo identify and evaluate all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the use of topical NSAIDs with placebo or any alternative analgesic interventions in adults with traumatic corneal abrasions (including corneal abrasions arising from foreign body removal), to reduce pain, and its effects on healing time. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (2017, Issue 2), MEDLINE Ovid (1946 to 30 March 2017), Embase Ovid (1947 to 30 March 2017), LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature Database) (1982 to 30 March 2017), OpenGrey (System for Information on Grey Literature in Europe) (www.opengrey.eu/); searched 30 March 2017, ZETOC (1993 to 30 March 2017), the ISRCTN registry (www.isrctn.com/editAdvancedSearch); searched 30 March 2017, ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov); searched 30 March 2017 and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en); searched 30 March 2017. We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials.We checked the reference lists of identified trials to search for further potentially relevant studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: RCTs comparing topical NSAIDs to placebo or any alternative analgesic interventions in adults with traumatic corneal abrasions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently performed data extraction and assessed risks of bias in the included studies. We rated the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. MAIN

resultsWe included nine studies that met the inclusion criteria, reporting data on 637 participants.The studies took place in the UK, USA, Israel, Italy, France and Portugal. These studies compared five types of topical NSAIDs (0.1% indomethacin, 0.03% flurbiprofen, 0.5% ketorolac, 1% indomethacin, 0.1% diclofenac) to control (consisting of standard care and in four studies used placebo eye drops). Overall, the studies were at an unclear or high risk of bias (particularly selection and reporting bias). None of the included studies reported the primary outcome measures of this review, namely participant-reported pain intensity reduction of 30% or more or 50% or more at 24 hours. Four trials, that included data on 481 participants receiving NSAIDs or control (placebo/standard care), reported on the use of 'rescue' analgesia at 24 hours as a proxy measure of pain control. Topical NSAIDs were associated with a reduction in the need for oral analgesia compared with control (risk ratio (RR) 0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34 to 0.61; low-certainty evidence). Approximately 4 out of 10 people in the control group used rescue analgesia at 24 hours. No data were available on the use of analgesia at 48 or 72 hours.One trial (28 participants) reported on the proportion of abrasions healed after 24 and 48 hours. These outcomes were similar in both arms of the trial. (at 24 hours RR 1.00 (0.81 to 1.23); at 48 hours RR 1.00 (0.88 to 1.14); low-certainty evidence). In the control group nine out of 10 abrasions were healed within 24 hours and all were healed by 48 hours. Complications of corneal abrasions were reported in 6 studies (609 participants) and were infrequently reported (4 complications, 1 in NSAID groups (recurrent corneal erosion) and 3 in control groups (2 recurrent corneal erosions and 1 corneal abscess), very low-certainty evidence). Possible drug-related adverse events (AEs) were reported in two trials (163 participants), with the number of adverse events low (4 AEs, 3 in NSAID group, including discomfort/photophobia on instillation, conjunctival hyperaemia and urticaria, and 1 in the control group, corneal abscess) very low-certainty evidence. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThe findings of the included studies do not provide strong evidence to support the use of topical NSAIDs in traumatic corneal abrasions. This is important, since NSAIDs are associated with a higher cost compared to oral analgesics. None of the trials addressed our primary outcome measure of participant-reported pain intensity reduction of 30% or more or 50% or more at 24 hours.

Indexed as

Administration, TopicalAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalCorneal InjuriesDiclofenacFlurbiprofenHumansIndomethacinKetorolacPain MeasurementRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicWound HealingAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalDiclofenacFlurbiprofenIndomethacinKetorolac

Identifiers

PMID28516471
PMCPMC6481688
OpenAlexW1923784577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.