ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2017
Screening for Diabetic Eye Disease among Samoan Adults: A Pilot Study.
Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Type 2 Diabetes Prevalence, Control and Management within Fiji,Kiribati, Samoa, the Solomon Islands, Tonga, and Vanuatu: A ScopingReview with a Systematic Approach.Current diabetes reviews · 2024Pooled it
- The Microfluidic Toolbox for Analyzing Exosome Biomarkers of Aging.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in Samoa by piloting a retinal photography screening programme.
methodsWe performed a cross-sectional study of patients with diabetes who presented to the Tupua Tamasese Meaole eye clinic in Apia, Samoa, between May 2011 and September 2011. Study approval was granted by the National Health Service Board of Samoa, the Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee, and the study adhered to the Tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Following informed consent, data collection included patient demographics [age, area of residence (rural or urban)], type of diabetes, length of time since diagnosis, most recent random blood sugar and blood pressure levels. The subjects had three 45-degree retinal photographs taken in each eye with the Canon CR6-45NM camera. All gradable photographs were assessed for the presence of diabetic retinopathy or macular oedema using the International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale and the International Clinical Diabetic Macular Oedema Severity scale, respectively.
resultsTwo hundred and fourteen eyes from 107 subjects were examined during the study period, all of whom had type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetic retinopathy was present in 53.3% (114/214) of eyes, with 14.5% having proliferative retinopathy and 7.5% with severe non-proliferative retinopathy. Also, 25.2% (54/214) had some evidence of macular oedema with 11.7% (25/214) requiring treatment. A statistically significant relationship existed between the length of time since diagnosis and the severity of both retinopathy (p < 0.001) and macular oedema (p = 0.031). Blood pressure more than 150/85 mmHg was associated with higher levels of diabetic retinopathy (p = 0.03) and macular oedema (p = 0.02).
conclusionA comprehensive diabetic retinopathy screening programme is much needed in Samoa given the high prevalence of diabetic eye disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.