ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2017
An Update on the Approach to the Imaging of Brain Tumors.
Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global, regional, and national burden of brain and other central nervous system cancers from 1990 to 2021, and projections to 2035: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2021.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Structural- and DTI- MRI enable automated prediction of IDH Mutation Status in CNS WHO Grade 2-4 glioma patients: a deep Radiomics Approach.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- Article
- PET Use in Cancer Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Review
- Characterizing Brain Tumor Regions Using Texture Analysis in Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Current and Future Imaging Methods for Evaluating Response to Immunotherapy in Neuro-Oncology.Theranostics · 2019Review
- Intravoxel incoherent motion MRI in neurological and cerebrovascular diseases.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewNeuroimaging plays a critical role in diagnosis of brain tumors and in assessment of response to therapy. However, challenges remain, including accurately and reproducibly assessing response to therapy, defining endpoints for neuro-oncology trials, providing prognostic information, and differentiating progressive disease from post-therapeutic changes particularly in the setting of antiangiogenic and other novel therapies. RECENT
findingsRecent advances in the imaging of brain tumors include application of advanced MRI imaging techniques to assess tumor response to therapy and analysis of imaging features correlating to molecular markers, grade, and prognosis. This review aims to summarize recent advances in imaging as applied to current diagnostic and therapeutic neuro-oncologic challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28516376What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.