Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28516361›Full record

ArticleHuman nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.)2017

Familiarity with Own Population's Appearance Influences Facial Preferences.

Carlota Batres, Mallini Kannan, David I Perrett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mate assessment based on physical characteristics: a review and reflection.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carlota BatresSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9JP, UK. jcb23@st-andrews.ac.uk.
Mallini KannanSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9JP, UK.
David I PerrettSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9JP, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies have found that individuals from rural areas in Malaysia and in El Salvador prefer heavier women than individuals from urban areas. Several explanations have been proposed to explain these differences in weight preferences but no study has explored familiarity as a possible explanation. We therefore sought to investigate participants' face preferences while also examining the facial characteristics of the actual participants. Our results showed that participants from rural areas preferred heavier-looking female faces than participants from urban areas. We also found that the female faces from the rural areas were rated as looking heavier than the female faces from the urban areas. Our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that familiarity may be contributing to the differences found in face preferences between rural and urban areas given that people from rural and urban areas are exposed to different faces.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorCross-Cultural ComparisonFacial RecognitionRecognition, PsychologyRural PopulationUrban PopulationAdultEl SalvadorFemaleHumansMalaysiaMaleYoung AdultAdiposityCross-cultural analysesFacesFamiliarityPreferences

Identifiers

PMID28516361
PMCPMC5524856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.