Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28516359›Full record

ArticleThe AAPS journal2017

Evolution of Choice of Solubility and Dissolution Media After Two Decades of Biopharmaceutical Classification System.

Nadia Bou-Chacra, Katherine Jasmine Curo Melo, Ivan Andrés Cordova Morales, Erika S Stippler, Filippos Kesisoglou, Mehran Yazdanian, Raimar Löbenberg

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The AAPS journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Prediction of In Vitro Drug Dissolution into Fed-state Biorelevant Media: Contributions of Solubility Enhancement and Relatively Low Colloid Diffusivity.European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. On the usefulness of four in vitro methods in assessing the intraluminal performance of poorly soluble, ionisable compounds in the fasted state.European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences · 2022
    Article
  20. Fasted intestinal solubility limits and distributions applied to the biopharmaceutics and developability classification systems.European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Nadia Bou-ChacraFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Katherine Jasmine Curo MeloFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Ivan Andrés Cordova MoralesFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Erika S StipplerUnited States Pharmacopeial Convention, Rockville, MD, USA.
Filippos KesisoglouMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Mehran YazdanianTeva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, West Chester, PA, USA.
Raimar LöbenbergFaculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. raimar@ualberta.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-0919-0213
Universidade de São Paulo · BRMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USTeva Pharmaceuticals (United States) · USUnited States Pharmacopeial Convention · USUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The introduction of the biopharmaceutics drug classification system (Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS)), in 1995, provided a simple way to describe the biopharmaceutics behavior of a drug. Solubility and permeability are among the major parameters, which determine the fraction dose absorbed of a drug substance and consequently its chances to be bioavailable. The purpose of this review is to summarize the evolution of the media used for determining solubility and dissolution and how this can be used in modern drug development. Over the years, physiologically adapted media and buffers were introduced with the intention to better predict the in vivo solubility and dissolution of drug substances. Water, buffer solutions, compendial media, micellar solubilization media, and biorelevant media are reviewed. At this time point, there is no universal medium available which can be used to predict every drug substance's solubility or a drug product's in vivo dissolution behavior. However, there have been many improvements and additions made to media to optimize their in vivo predictability; for example, the current phosphate concentrations in buffers seem to be too high to correlate with the carbonate buffer concentrations in vivo. Biorelevant media were updated to correlate them better with the composition of human intestinal fluids. The BCS was introduced into regulatory sciences as a scientific risk management tool to waive bioequivalence studies under certain conditions. Today's different guidance documents define the dose-solubility ratio differently. As shown for amoxicillin, this can cause more confusion than certainty for globally operating companies. Harmonization of BCS guidelines is highly desirable.

Indexed as

Biological AvailabilityBiopharmaceuticsDrug DesignHumansMicellesSolubilityMicellesBCSdissolutionIVIVCsolubility

Identifiers

PMID28516359
OpenAlexW2614551883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.