ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2017
Evaluation of vascular effect of arsenic using in vivo assays.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Chronic arsenic exposure-provoked biotoxicity involved in liver-microbiota-gut axis disruption in chickens based on multi-omics technologies.Journal of advanced research · 2025Article
- Arsenic-induced oxidative stress, cholinesterase activity in the brain of Swiss albino mice, and its amelioration by antioxidants Vitamin E and Coenzyme Q10.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Arsenic (As) is an abundant toxicant present in groundwater and soil in various parts of the world including eastern part of India. The epidemiological studies have shown that arsenic exposure is linked to developmental defects and miscarriage. Placenta is known to utilize vasculogenesis to develop its vasculature circulation. The effects of four different doses of sodium meta-arsenite (0, 10, 20, 75, and 150 ppm) were assessed on the vascular structure using two different in vivo models, i.e., Matrigel and chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay. For the Matrigel assay, mice were exposed to different doses of arsenic through drinking water for 1 month. Placenta and Matrigel plug (which was inserted on gestational day (GD 0.5)) were removed on GD 14. Similar arsenic concentration was used in CAM assay to observe the effect of vessel development in hen's eggs. The CAM assay outcome evaluated by Angiosys software showed that arsenic exposure reduced the total and mean tubule length in all the arsenic-treated groups. The percentage tubule inhibition was declined significantly in 20, 75, and 150 ppm arsenic-treated groups as evaluated by ImageJ software. Analysis of the CAM outcome by both the image analysis software indicated the adverse effect of arsenic on the tubules. Further, a significant higher blood vessel density in 10 ppm and lower vessel density in 20, 75, and 150 ppm arsenic-exposed mice were also observed in Matrigel plug assay. The placental hypertrophy and dysplasia especially in the labyrinth zone (vasculature) were noted in placenta of arsenic-treated mice. The study indicated that higher arsenic exposures inhibited the angiogenesis which was dose-dependent in both CAM and Matrigel assay and altered structural morphology of placenta. However, no inhibition of blood vessels was noted at lower, i.e., 10 ppm of arsenic-treated group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.