Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28516311›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2017

Duodenal and Ampullary Carcinoid Tumors: Size Predicts Necessity for Lymphadenectomy.

Epameinondas Dogeas, John L Cameron, Cristopher L Wolfgang, Kenzo Hirose, Ralph H Hruban, Martin A Makary, Timothy A Pawlik, Michael A Choti

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Nonexposure full-thickness resection in a laparoscopic-endoscopic approach as a hybrid technique for nonampullary duodenal neuroendocrine tumor.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Surgical and Endoscopic Resection of Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumors Have Similar Disease-Specific Survival Outcome.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Current Oncologic Standards for Surgery of Small Bowel Cancers.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Clip band ligation ablation.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2021
    Article
  20. Endoscopic papillectomy for an ampullary neuroendocrine tumor.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Epameinondas DogeasDepartment of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75390-9031, USA.
John L CameronDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Cristopher L WolfgangDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kenzo HiroseDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ralph H HrubanDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Martin A MakaryDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Timothy A PawlikDepartment of Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Michael A ChotiDepartment of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75390-9031, USA. michael.choti@utsouthwestern.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnlike other neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, management of duodenal and periampullary carcinoids remains controversial. We aimed to determine the metastatic potential and optimal choice of therapy for these neoplasms.

methodsA retrospective review of all patients treated at the Johns Hopkins Hospital between 1996 and 2012 was conducted. Clinicopathologic factors associated with lymph nodal involvement and clinical outcomes were evaluated.

resultsA total of 101 patients were identified. Eighty (79.2%) tumors arose from the duodenum and 21 (20.8%) from the periampullary area. Thirty-five (34.7%) patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), 12 (11.9%) local resection, 38 (37.6%) endoscopic excision, and 16 (15.8%) patients harbored incidental tumors identified in the specimen after PD for another indication. Lymph node (LN) pathologic evaluation was done in 56 patients, among which 27 (48%) had positive LN. Specifically, LN positivity (LN+) for tumors <1 cm in size was 4.5% (1/22), for tumors 1-2 cm 72% (13/18), and for tumors >2 cm 81% (13/16). Tumor size was the only factor associated with LN+ (p = 0.029).

conclusionLymph nodal involvement is common for duodenal and periampullary carcinoid tumors, particularly among those >1 cm in size; therefore, resection with lymphadenectomyfor these larger tumors is recommended.

Indexed as

Ampulla of VaterLymph Node ExcisionTumor BurdenAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoid TumorCommon Bile Duct NeoplasmsDuodenal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedPancreaticoduodenectomyRetrospective StudiesCarcinoid tumorsDuodenal carcinoidLymph nodesNeuroendocrine tumors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.